Search for: "S.B. V. STATE"
Results 41 - 60
of 595
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Sep 2021, 1:29 pm
I have no idea whether this overcomes the problems that, in my mind, plague individual suits--no state official or person working for the state enforces this law. [read post]
9 Sep 2021, 2:42 pm
[This case really should be captioned United States v. [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 3:15 pm
STATE v. [read post]
29 Oct 2021, 5:26 pm
Mitchell, credited as the devious mind behind Texas’s S.B. 8, presumably demonstrates that he knows how to correctly pronounce “Chick-fil-A”: Yesterday, the Supreme Court of Texas heard oral argument in Von Dohlen v. [read post]
25 Oct 2021, 9:39 am
ShareMary Ziegler is a law professor at Florida State University and the author of Abortion and the Law in America: Roe v. [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 12:30 pm
Last week’s online symposium reflected various perspectives on how the Supreme Court is likely to rule on Arizona’s S.B. 1070 in light of its recent decision in Chamber of Commerce v. [read post]
12 Jul 2011, 9:03 am
The following is an essay for our symposium on Arizona v. [read post]
27 Jun 2012, 1:09 pm
S.B. 1070 makes racial profiling Arizona state policy. [read post]
27 Apr 2012, 6:19 am
Ilya Shapiro and Carl DeNigris of CATO@Liberty contend that in this week’s decision in United States v. [read post]
19 May 2022, 9:01 pm
On May 13, 2022, a judge of the Los Angeles County Superior Court ruled in Crest v. [read post]
7 Mar 2013, 7:30 am
Eight months later, in early 2012, in the long awaited decision in Edwards Aquifer Authority and the State of Texas v. [read post]
26 Feb 2007, 12:57 pm
Loc. 93 v. [read post]
Supreme Court Grants Extra Rapid Review In Texas Abortion Cases, But Postpones Granting Interim Stay
22 Oct 2021, 12:16 pm
Also today, the Court acted in United States v. [read post]
3 Sep 2021, 4:59 pm
And due to S.B. 8's unique structure, I think facial challenges will also fail–whether brought by abortion providers or the United States. [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 1:59 pm
Tellingly, Arizona did not step up to defend what the state legislature actually did in S.B. 1070. [read post]
31 Oct 2021, 9:48 am
Jackson and United States v. [read post]
15 Jul 2011, 11:04 am
Of course, under United States v. [read post]
30 Jan 2009, 2:29 pm
") and Ford v State Bd of Ed, 166 Mich 658, 660; 132 NW 467 (1911) ("These creditors have no lien upon this public building. [read post]
20 Sep 2021, 8:05 pm
" Indeed, Gomez states that he filed the suit so that the court can declare S.B. 8 unconstitutional. [read post]
