Search for: "SEC v. Howey Co" Results 1 - 20 of 56
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Apr 2019, 6:59 am by John Jascob
According to the court, the complaint established that the virtual currency at issue was an “investment contract” under the test set forth in SEC v. [read post]
12 Feb 2018, 7:36 am by Arina Shulga
   Some legal practitioners adopted a conservative attitude trying to fit the tokens of their clients within the tests provided by the 1946 SEC v. [read post]
23 May 2018, 7:15 am by Ildiko Duckor
Howey Co., which has remained the authority on determining what a “security” is (and thus subject to SEC regulation). [read post]
23 May 2018, 7:15 am by Ildiko Duckor
Howey Co., which has remained the authority on determining what a “security” is (and thus subject to SEC regulation). [read post]
5 Jul 2018, 8:27 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  At the outset of his speech, Hinman emphasized that the SEC will apply the facts-and-circumstances test enunciated in SEC v. [read post]
15 Sep 2017, 4:00 am by Monica Goyal
Howey Co., 328 U.S. 293, 301 (1946) (Howey), commonly known as the “Howey Test”. [read post]
Howey Co. from 1946 and which is still used today, having been affirmed by the Supreme Court as recently as 2004. [read post]