Search for: "SEC v. Howey Co" Results 1 - 20 of 101
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
And for years, the SEC has clearly and consistently applied Howey and its progeny to protect investors in the crypto space. [read post]
3 Jan 2024, 8:21 am by Unknown
Significantly, the court found that a stablecoin was a security in combination with another protocol and that “staking” provided the basis for finding a token was a security (SEC v. [read post]
17 Dec 2023, 9:03 pm by renholding
Howey Co.,[2] an investment contract exists when there is the investment of money in a common enterprise with a reasonable expectation of profits to be derived from the efforts of others. [read post]
9 Nov 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
My favorite memory of Scott is crossing paths on the way to or from getting lunch in Union Station, where Scott was often accompanied by his close friends and co-workers Tom Sporkin, Greg Faragasso, and John Polise. [read post]
23 Aug 2023, 3:30 am by David Lynn
This summer, Meredith has been covering the decision in SEC v. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 4:58 am by Unknown
The SEC’s complaint had alleged that numerous crypto assets traded on Bittrex were investment contracts and, thus, securities under Howey. [read post]
24 Jul 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
Howey Co., 328 U.S. 293 (1946) and its progeny, is a factor that weighs in favor of treating an asset as a security — the token would be presumed to be a commodity and fall within the CFTC’s jurisdiction, as long as the issuer follows certain SEC disclosure requirements. [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 9:05 pm by ilyabeylin
  However, the other critical issue for the SEC to appeal is the opinion’s disregard for cases expanding on the first Howey prong. [read post]