Search for: "SEC v. Howey Co" Results 41 - 60 of 101
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
And for years, the SEC has clearly and consistently applied Howey and its progeny to protect investors in the crypto space. [read post]
28 Feb 2022, 9:00 am by Law Offices of Salar Atrizadeh
The most prominent case that’s applicable in the determination of whether an NFT is a security or an asset is SEC v. [read post]
7 Feb 2018, 2:09 pm by Gustav L. Schmidt
The Howey test, named after the case in which the test was first applied, Securities and Exchange Commission v. [read post]
17 Dec 2023, 9:03 pm by renholding
Howey Co.,[2] an investment contract exists when there is the investment of money in a common enterprise with a reasonable expectation of profits to be derived from the efforts of others. [read post]
13 Oct 2010, 3:23 am by Peter Vodola
The Supreme Court formulated the definition of “investment contract,” in SEC v. [read post]
24 Jul 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
Howey Co., 328 U.S. 293 (1946) and its progeny, is a factor that weighs in favor of treating an asset as a security — the token would be presumed to be a commodity and fall within the CFTC’s jurisdiction, as long as the issuer follows certain SEC disclosure requirements. [read post]
10 Jul 2023, 8:26 am by Edward T. Kang and Kandis Kovalsky
The SEC believes the vast majority of cryptocurrencies are securities based on the Howey test, the framework used to determine if an asset is a security articulated in SEC v. [read post]
Second, a few key themes repeated throughout the complaint provide insight into what the SEC sees as relevant under the Howey factors: The SEC consistently homes in on the fact that, for each token, the founders or development team held a large tranche of tokens — apparently suggesting that their economic incentives were aligned with purchasers’ — which may be relevant to the “common enterprise” and/or “expectation of… [read post]
25 Apr 2014, 12:46 am by Arina Shulga
According to the well-known to all U.S. legal professionals case, SEC v. [read post]