Search for: "SEC v. Howey Co." Results 1 - 20 of 101
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Apr 2019, 6:59 am by John Jascob
According to the court, the complaint established that the virtual currency at issue was an “investment contract” under the test set forth in SEC v. [read post]
3 Jan 2024, 8:21 am by Unknown
Significantly, the court found that a stablecoin was a security in combination with another protocol and that “staking” provided the basis for finding a token was a security (SEC v. [read post]
23 Aug 2023, 3:30 am by David Lynn
This summer, Meredith has been covering the decision in SEC v. [read post]
1 Nov 2022, 8:38 am by Race to the Bottom
Howey Co., proposed requiring some form of post-sale obligation to form an investment contract. [read post]
12 Feb 2018, 7:36 am by Arina Shulga
   Some legal practitioners adopted a conservative attitude trying to fit the tokens of their clients within the tests provided by the 1946 SEC v. [read post]
23 May 2018, 7:15 am by Ildiko Duckor
Howey Co., which has remained the authority on determining what a “security” is (and thus subject to SEC regulation). [read post]
23 May 2018, 7:15 am by Ildiko Duckor
Howey Co., which has remained the authority on determining what a “security” is (and thus subject to SEC regulation). [read post]
30 Jun 2019, 8:35 am by Arina Shulga
  As a way of background (just in case you haven't heard enough about it yet), the US Supreme Court ruled in SEC v. [read post]