Search for: "SEC v. Levin"
Results 1 - 20
of 121
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Aug 2020, 7:57 am
Brownstein, Sabastian V. [read post]
25 Apr 2019, 8:07 am
Levin, Director of the SEC’s Chicago Regional Office. [read post]
20 Jan 2011, 6:39 am
See SEC v. [read post]
28 Nov 2023, 9:05 pm
Speaking of jury trials – or rather, the lack of them – today is the day that the SCOTUS will hear arguments in SEC v. [read post]
7 Mar 2013, 2:41 pm
I've blogged a lot about this case over the years, but I honestly don't have anything to add to Matt Levine's excellent diagnosis of the recent developments, which I think is spot on. [read post]
15 Sep 2015, 2:09 am
As noted in this Cooley blog, the three-judge panel in Berman v. [read post]
18 Dec 2018, 10:24 am
In a recent Client Alert, Hunton insurance lawyers Mike Levine, Sergio Oehninger and Josh Paster discuss the impact of the Second Circuit’s recent opinion in Patriarch Partners, LLC v. [read post]
2 May 2022, 8:31 pm
Supreme Court decision in SEC v. [read post]
24 Aug 2021, 12:25 pm
See McGraw v. [read post]
9 Nov 2023, 9:01 pm
I arrived at the SEC in October 2006 to serve as counsel to Commissioner Paul Atkins. [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 4:23 am
See SEC v. [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 8:03 am
Bill Frievogel points out a new and interesting ethical screening decision from the US District Court in New York: SEC v. [read post]
20 Sep 2022, 12:11 pm
Louis on behalf of Marriott Int’l, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Mar 2009, 10:00 pm
" Riegel v. [read post]
26 Feb 2015, 6:54 am
Levin, but due to other issues, could not be pursued. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 2:00 am
In Wood v. [read post]
30 Sep 2015, 5:07 am
Levin and Frank J. [read post]
27 Apr 2009, 10:00 pm
Medtronic and Wyeth v. [read post]
4 Oct 2013, 5:46 am
There are several provocative employment law issues awaiting the High Court during the 2013-2014 term, including the first case scheduled for oral arguments, Madigan v Levin (Dkt No 12-872), in which the Court will determine whether state and local government employees may avoid the ADEA and bring age discrimination claims directly under the Equal Protection Clause and Section 1983. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 5:00 am
In SEC v Capital Gains Research Bureau the US Supreme Court said a pump and dump scheme by an investment adviser violated its fiduciary duty. [read post]
