Search for: "SEC v. National Securities, Inc." Results 281 - 300 of 492
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Jan 2016, 5:05 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  The government response was the enactment of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, which created the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and made financial reporting obligatory for public corporations. [read post]
25 Nov 2015, 2:04 pm by Ronald Mann
In an unusual twist, though, Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner, & Smith, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Aug 2015, 7:11 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Aug. 18, 2105)  After the AMI en banc decision, the panel granted rehearing of National Association of Manufacturers v. [read post]
9 Aug 2015, 6:03 pm by Kevin LaCroix
” The appellate court added that “other courts interpreting identical insured v. insured exclusions have reached the same conclusion. [read post]
The DOJ’s antitrust probe came to light in mid-May after United Artists Theatre Circuit Inc., a subsidiary of Regal Entertainment Group, announced in its own SEC filing that the DOJ is investigating potential Sherman Act violations by Regal, AMC, and Cinemark Holdings Inc., which together make up the nation’s three largest movie theater chains. [read post]
22 Apr 2015, 3:56 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Freeman, 43 Misc.2d 616, 251 N.Y.S.2d 996, affd. 24 A.D.2d 704, 262 N.Y.S.2d 431; National Psychological Assn. for Psychoanalysis, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Apr 2015, 3:32 am by Jon Gelman
Since these investigations included allegations of possible securities law violations, the SEC found that these terms violated Rule 21F-17, which prohibits companies from taking any action to impede whistleblowers from reporting possible securities violations to the SEC. [read post]