Search for: "SEC v. National Securities, Inc." Results 401 - 420 of 492
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Aug 2017, 9:10 pm by Dan Flynn
Disney had to report its payment to the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), so we know that much. [read post]
7 Dec 2022, 8:00 am by Linda C. Severin
  While there, she prosecuted many notable FCA cases including several qui tam cases against National Medicare Care, Inc. [read post]
23 Oct 2017, 4:22 pm by Kevin LaCroix
In the SEC’s Examination Priorities, published on January 12, 2017, the SEC warned publicly traded companies that it will be investigating cybersecurity practices with higher scrutiny.[18] Specifically, the SEC states that “[i]n 2017, we will continue our initiative to examine for cybersecurity compliance procedures and controls, including testing and implementation of those procedures and controls. [read post]
23 Oct 2017, 4:22 pm by Kevin LaCroix
In the SEC’s Examination Priorities, published on January 12, 2017, the SEC warned publicly traded companies that it will be investigating cybersecurity practices with higher scrutiny.[18] Specifically, the SEC states that “[i]n 2017, we will continue our initiative to examine for cybersecurity compliance procedures and controls, including testing and implementation of those procedures and controls. [read post]
11 Nov 2018, 4:03 pm by Wolfgang Demino
If they never made any payments on their respective loans, Foster and Mock were in effect net beneficiaries of the predatory loans (at least as long as the Trusts do not garnish their bank accounts, if any, judgments secured). [read post]
19 Jan 2012, 3:49 pm by Steve Bainbridge
It's been a while since I taught Securities Regulation, but my recollection is that the SEC takes the position that shareholder rights under the securities laws cannot be subject to mandatory arbitration. [read post]
1 May 2018, 4:14 am by Edith Roberts
” At Arbitration Nation, Liz Kramer observes that when the court rules in the third new case, Lamps Plus Inc. v. [read post]