Search for: "SEC v. Wills" Results 1 - 20 of 576
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 May 2024, 5:27 am by Jacob Ford Ridgeway
Adding to these challenges is the adoption by the Supreme Court of the “Major Questions Doctrine” in the 2022 case West Virginia v. [read post]
17 May 2024, 4:43 am by Matthias Weller
by Achim Czubaiko, Research Fellow („Wissenschaftlicher Mitarbeiter“) and PhD Candidate, supported by the German Scholarship Foundation, Institute for German and International Civil Procedural Law, University of Bonn. [read post]
21 Mar 2024, 8:51 am by Eric Goldman
GmbH as a Possible Trademark Troll The post Judge Hammers SEC for Lying to Get an Ex Parte TRO–SEC v. [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 9:09 am by CFM Admin
A willful failure to timely comply with the reporting requirements can result in civil and criminal penalties. [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 1:19 pm by Kevin LaCroix
According to the SEC’s Rule 34-98738, which went into effect on Jan. 2, “[w]hile short selling can serve useful market purposes, such as facilitating price discovery, there are concerns that it could be used to drive down the price of a security, to accelerate a declining market in a security, or to manipulate stock prices. [read post]
24 Nov 2023, 9:32 am by Eugene Volokh
Hardy (7th Cir. 2019) (affirming dismissal based on plaintiff's willful disobedience of discovery rules); Secrease v. [read post]
9 Nov 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
I arrived at the SEC in October 2006 to serve as counsel to Commissioner Paul Atkins. [read post]
10 Oct 2023, 1:10 pm by Unknown
The need for the holding period came into sharp focus, the association said, after the Supreme Court’s decision in Slack Technologies LLC v. [read post]
5 Sep 2023, 4:06 am by Henry P Yang
And InterDigital’s reliance on publicly available information from their SEC filings can be misleading ([923]). [read post]
1 Sep 2023, 12:43 pm by Unknown
While the government urged the justices to reverse the Fifth Circuit’s decision against the SEC in its entirety, portions of the government’s merits brief suggest the possibility of a split decision from the justices (SEC v. [read post]