Search for: "SEC v. Wills"
Results 361 - 380
of 582
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Sep 2007, 7:51 pm
"(Makes you want to take a second look at his vote in Bush v. [read post]
3 Apr 2010, 6:19 pm
., Inc. v. [read post]
13 Nov 2009, 12:19 pm
" Most recently, in Gonzales v. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 2:01 pm
Sec., 2010 WL 184312 (S.D.N.Y. [read post]
2 Dec 2009, 5:51 am
In her November 1st blog on Jones v. [read post]
29 May 2010, 4:27 pm
In Jones et al. v. [read post]
6 Oct 2016, 9:30 pm
Department of Justice (DOJ) asking the Court to rehear U.S. v. [read post]
13 Jul 2021, 5:30 am
Finding one that believed me and was willing to take on the case had not been easy. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 10:31 am
(U.S. v. [read post]
19 Nov 2012, 4:00 am
” {Mazer v. [read post]
7 Sep 2015, 2:47 pm
Delaware Court Questions Disclosure-Only Settlement of Merger Objection Lawsuit: As discussed here, in a July 8, 2015 decision in Acevedo v. [read post]
22 Oct 2007, 8:16 pm
Therefore, requiring hedge funds to report to SEC or the general public is not necessary. [read post]
6 Feb 2023, 9:01 pm
Instead, Delaware law and the SEC expect boards to be informed of risk and compliance issues that are “intrinsically critical” to the company. [read post]
19 Jan 2012, 3:49 pm
In another unpublished opinion, Gerber v. [read post]
4 Jan 2021, 1:26 pm
The directors’ and officers’ liability environment is always changing, but 2020 was a particularly eventful year, with important consequences for the D&O insurance marketplace. [read post]
21 Aug 2007, 1:10 am
This development follows a recent problematic decision by the 2nd Circuit in AFSCME v. [read post]
31 Jul 2014, 6:27 am
Here, the union was alleged to have continued contacting targets even after they had made clear that they were not willing to receive delegations. [read post]
21 Aug 2007, 5:11 am
This development follows a recent problematic decision by the 2nd Circuit in AFSCME v. [read post]
22 Aug 2017, 6:23 am
Judge Rogers dissented (U.S. ex rel Wall v. [read post]
7 Dec 2015, 6:25 am
In rejecting the hospital’s claim that the grievance was barred by the six-month limitations period of LMRA Sec. 301, the appeals court concluded that it was not reasonable for the hospital to wait in silence for more than five months following the union’s demand for arbitration and then claim in litigation that the union missed the statute of limitations (SEIU United Healthcare Workers-West v. [read post]
