Search for: "SEC v. Wills"
Results 441 - 460
of 492
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Apr 2009, 1:44 pm
Overstock.com Q4 2008 violated GAAP by failing to restate prior financial reports to correct a material accounting error and instead recognized a one-time gain to show its first profit in 15 quarters (Details here).Lee Webb from Stockwatch chronicled my year long battle with Overstock.com to successfully force the company to comply with SEC Regulation G for certain non-GAAP financial disclosures and my ongoing battle to force the company to comply with GAAP and SEC rules in… [read post]
10 Apr 2009, 10:12 am
Co. of N.Y. v. [read post]
5 Apr 2009, 6:00 pm
Commissioner v. [read post]
5 Apr 2009, 1:26 pm
The SEC’s investigatory and enforcement efforts are likely to remain active and aggressive, particularly in light of the recent criticism that the SEC failed to adequately investigate Bernard Madoff’s investment business. [read post]
23 Mar 2009, 1:26 pm
Sec. 924(e). [read post]
15 Feb 2009, 6:07 pm
Jim Costa was willing to spend $1.9 million to gain the seat in 2004. [read post]
14 Feb 2009, 11:56 am
Part V identifies key unresolved issues in the state courts. [read post]
23 Jan 2009, 1:49 am
Part V. [read post]
20 Jan 2009, 3:33 am
The defendants moved to dismiss this litigation on demand futility grounds.The Trial Court’s DismissalThe New York trial court first applied the pleading standard for surviving a demand futility challenge enunciated by the New York court of appeals in Marx v. [read post]
2 Jan 2009, 4:57 am
[Federal Register: December 19, 2008 (Volume 73, Number 245)][Rules and Regulations] [Page 77473-77491]From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov][DOCID:fr19de08-1] --------------------------------------- Rules and Regulations Federal Register --------------------------------------- This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains regulatory documents having general applicability and legal effect, most of which are keyed to and codified in the Code of Federal Regulations,… [read post]
20 Nov 2008, 8:19 pm
A similar case, Namur v. [read post]
13 Nov 2008, 3:20 pm
Cooper jokingly describes this hearing as Paulson v. [read post]
13 Oct 2008, 7:20 am
Underhill in his work on Criminal Evidence (Sec. 88) thus states this exception to the general rule: "No separate and isolated crime can be given in evidence. [read post]
7 Oct 2008, 9:06 am
Mitchum v. [read post]
15 Sep 2008, 7:55 pm
Murex Sec., Ltd. after the jump. [read post]
25 Aug 2008, 11:04 pm
Nothing in the Guidance prevents the Sec of State obtaining an injunction. [read post]
25 Aug 2008, 3:54 pm
Credit Suisse Secs. [read post]
25 Aug 2008, 11:16 am
"The SEC previously expressed its support for such a conclusion in an amicus brief filed in similar litigation. [read post]
23 Jul 2008, 4:38 pm
See MPEP Sec. [read post]
