Search for: "SEC v. Wills" Results 81 - 100 of 553
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Apr 2010, 6:00 am by J Robert Brown Jr.
  Presumably Paulson would have been content to buy the swaps from AIG or from anyone else willing to take the long side of the risk. [read post]
22 Nov 2011, 6:21 am by Apar Gupta
It is stated that the information if any required can be sought under Section 69 of the Act and which the petitioner is willing to furnish. [read post]
10 Dec 2009, 6:09 am by James Morphy, Sullivan & Cromwell LLP,
Third, the SEC has adopted amendments to remove references to ratings of NRSROs from a few SEC rules and forms, and it has reopened the comment period with respect to similar proposals for other rules and forms. [read post]
2 May 2011, 5:00 am by Kimberly A. Kralowec
Since last Wednesday the legal blogosphere has been busily abuzz about AT&T Mobility v. [read post]
7 Sep 2010, 6:00 am by Keith Paul Bishop
”  In support of this proposition, the SEC cites an 80 year old Delaware case, Triplex Shoe Co. v. [read post]
The new case, The Pension Committee of the University of Montreal Pension Plan v. [read post]
30 Jun 2008, 5:00 pm
” The provision provides that removal may occur for willful violations of the law, willful abuse of authority, or the failure, “without reasonable justification or excuse” to enforce compliance with the Act. [read post]