Search for: "SHAW v. CALIFORNIA" Results 1 - 20 of 328
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 May 2009, 10:22 am
According to the California Supreme Court's conference results list, the court has declined to review Blanks v. [read post]
23 Feb 2009, 10:39 am
The California Court of Appeal (Second District, Division Three) issued this published opinion last week, reversing a $15 million punitive damages award in a legal malpractice action brought by Tae Bo creator Bill Blanks against the law firm Seyfarth Shaw and one if its partners, William Lancaster.The opinion doesn't contain any analysis of punitive damages issues per se, because the court found that the entire judgment had to be reversed due to instructional errors committed… [read post]
25 Nov 2007, 11:52 am
CALIFORNIA'S NEW LEAVE FOR MILITARY SPOUSESBy Jennifer Brown Shaw and Carolyn G. [read post]
30 Sep 2020, 2:00 am by Mark I. Schickman, Schickman Law
 Moritz v Universal City Studios (California Court of Appeal, Second Appellate District, 9/2/20). [read post]
10 Dec 2009, 1:35 am
California - The California Supreme Court upholds the attorney-client privilege for outside counsel’s communications to a corporate client Seyfarth Shaw LLP "On November 30, 2009, in a highly anticipated ruling, the California Supreme Court strongly preserved the sanctity of the attorney-client privilege in Randall et al. v. [read post]
11 Aug 2014, 11:40 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
  It should be noted that, after this Release went to press, the California Supreme Court addressed these issues and more in detail in Duran v. [read post]
7 Apr 2014, 6:49 pm by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
Authored by Seyfarth Shaw LLPRecently, one of our colleagues, Jim Harris, attended the oral argument in Iskanian v. [read post]
25 Jan 2013, 3:34 pm by Eric Schweibenz
  Accordingly, under this supposition, the disputed issues were whether the prior art (i) satisfies the limitations requiring “superposed perimeter edge portion arrangements;” (ii) discloses shielded, non-superposed areas; (iii) teaches a consecutive 5-layer stack-up; (iv) satisfies the spacing relationships recited in the asserted claims; and (v) teach a substrate. [read post]
20 Aug 2013, 4:43 am by Law360
The California Court of Appeal's recent decision in California Building Industry Association v. [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 3:08 pm by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
Authored by Seyfarth Shaw LLP By David Kadue On Tuesday, January 20, 2015, the Court declined to take the case of CLS Transportation Los Angeles, LLC v. [read post]
20 Jul 2007, 5:50 am
Wear sunscreen in case you fall asleep.WORKPLACE BULLYING AND THE FUTURE OF THE "EQUAL OPPORTUNITY HARASSER" By Jennifer Brown Shaw and Becki GrahamENFORCING NON-COMPETE AGREEMENTS IN CALIFORNIA AFTER ADVANCED BIONICS V. [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 9:44 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
Authored by Seyfarth Shaw LLPBy Kristen Verrastro and Michele Haydel Gehrke Loyal readers will recall our discussion of the perplexing Cochran v. [read post]