Search for: "SHAW v. CALIFORNIA"
Results 181 - 200
of 328
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jun 2014, 4:29 am
Bauman, holding that the automaker could not be sued in California for injuries allegedly caused by conduct of its foreign subsidiary when that conduct took place entirely outside of the United States. [read post]
20 Jun 2014, 10:14 am
Shaw, 13-897, a state-on-top habeas case that asked whether, in an ineffective assistance claim, “a state appellate court’s holding that an omitted state law issue ultimately lacked merit precludes a federal habeas court from later finding either deficient performance or prejudice” under Strickland v. [read post]
4 Jun 2014, 1:58 pm
See Morillion v. [read post]
3 Jun 2014, 7:15 am
Shaw 13-897Issue: Whether, in a claim of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel, a state appellate court’s holding that an omitted state law issue ultimately lacked merit precludes a federal habeas court from later finding either deficient performance or prejudice relating to that omission under the standards of Strickland v. [read post]
22 May 2014, 8:57 am
To get a start, please subscribe to Seyfarth Shaw’s California Peculiarities blog. [read post]
21 May 2014, 11:01 am
Authored by Seyfarth Shaw LLPBy Chris Crosman Reporting time pay is one of the provisions of California wage and hour law that is often overlooked by employers. [read post]
9 Apr 2014, 11:59 am
” Murphy v. [read post]
7 Apr 2014, 6:49 pm
Authored by Seyfarth Shaw LLPRecently, one of our colleagues, Jim Harris, attended the oral argument in Iskanian v. [read post]
2 Apr 2014, 12:52 pm
Authored by Seyfarth Shaw LLPThis week’s post is the first in a four-part blog series entitled Dealing with California Agencies. [read post]
5 Mar 2014, 5:46 pm
– Randy Miller and Randy Shaheen of Venable on the firm’s blog, All About Advertising Law Top 10 Developments/Headlines in Trade Secret, Computer Fraud, and Non-Compete Law in 2013 – Los Angeles lawyers Robert Milligan and Joshua Salinas of Seyfarth Shaw on the firm’s blog, Trading Secrets Estate of Michael Jackson v. [read post]
22 Feb 2014, 6:00 am
MoranRepresentation and Raceblindness: The Story of Shaw v. [read post]
17 Dec 2013, 5:30 pm
Maatman, Jr. of Seyfarth Shaw on the firm’sEEOC Year-End Countdown Disconnecting From Work: A New Trend. [read post]
4 Dec 2013, 5:30 pm
Horton v. [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 9:26 pm
See, Arizona v. [read post]
30 Sep 2013, 9:05 pm
” [Christopher DeGroff, Seyfarth Shaw Workplace Class Action Blog, on Case New Holland v. [read post]
2 Sep 2013, 5:18 pm
Paparelli is a partner at Seyfarth Shaw in New York and Los Angeles. [read post]
17 Aug 2013, 3:11 pm
In GST v. [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 5:00 am
Josh says likely not.I agree and think the answer is found in Inergy Propane, LLC v. [read post]
19 Apr 2013, 9:00 am
Finally: Mondaq has a very nice summary of the Fifth Circuit's recent opinion in Avalon Legal Information Svcs. v. [read post]
16 Jan 2013, 12:36 am
Supreme Court decision, Atherton v. [read post]
