Search for: "SHAW v. CALIFORNIA" Results 261 - 280 of 326
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jul 2010, 10:33 am by Ric Blumhardt
Biggs (2008) 170 Cal.App.4th 127 (upholding teacher layoffs despite less-qualified teachers remaining on the job as permitted by the Education Code); and Shaw v. [read post]
22 Jul 2010, 10:33 am by Ric Blumhardt
Biggs (2008) 170 Cal.App.4th 127 (upholding teacher layoffs despite less-qualified teachers remaining on the job as permitted by the Education Code); and Shaw v. [read post]
7 Jul 2010, 11:07 am by R. Grace Rodriguez, Esq.
Shaw for Amici Curiae Bank of America and BAC Home Loans Servicingon behalf of Real Parties in Interest.Wright, Finlay & Zak, Thomas Robert Finlay and Jennifer A. [read post]
15 Jun 2010, 5:03 pm by Colin O'Keefe
NWC Demands Attorney General Hold the Offshore Oil Industry Liable for Fraud in the Gulf - Lindsey Williams of the National Whistleblower Center on their Whistleblowers Protection Blog Establishing Trade Secret Security Measures in NY - New York attorney David Monachino of Seyfarth Shaw on the firm's blog, Trading Secrets Government Considering Options for Pacific Electric Railroad Right of Way - Irvine lawyer Rick Rayl of Nossaman on the firm's… [read post]
22 Mar 2010, 4:28 am
Shaw Rose Nets (Patently-O) (Inventive Step) District Court S D California: In re TS Tech and In re Genentech do not apply where the requested venue is a neighbouring district: HP Hood LLC v. [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 2:30 pm
Accordingly, the California Court of Appeal (Fourth Appellate District, Division One) vacated the punitive damages award. [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 3:17 pm by admin
The following is a summary review of articles from all over the nation concerning environmental law settlements, decisions, regulatory actions and lawsuits filed during the past week. [read post]
10 Feb 2010, 1:36 pm by Adam Schlossman
Board of Education –Nina Totenberg, legal affairs correspondent for National Public Radio “The Global Impact of Brown v. [read post]
10 Dec 2009, 1:35 am
California - The California Supreme Court upholds the attorney-client privilege for outside counsel’s communications to a corporate client Seyfarth Shaw LLP "On November 30, 2009, in a highly anticipated ruling, the California Supreme Court strongly preserved the sanctity of the attorney-client privilege in Randall et al. v. [read post]
1 Dec 2009, 3:48 pm
The 40-page complaint, filed in Superior Court of California in Los Angeles, claims that Seyfarth Shaw breached its fiduciary duty to Lancaster by forcing him to relinquish his equity share. [read post]
16 Nov 2009, 4:47 pm
        Pharmaceutical Sales Reps, Certification of Issues to California Supreme Court:  D’Este v. [read post]
27 Oct 2009, 3:19 pm by Erika Birg
In an article published today by the Daily Journal, "Economy Leads Companies to Sue Ex-Workers," (linked with permission) author Laura Ernde talks with a number of California practitioners about what they see happening with trade secrets litigation in the wake of the California Supreme Court's ruling in Edwards v. [read post]