Search for: "SHAW v. CALIFORNIA"
Results 281 - 300
of 344
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Aug 2010, 4:39 am
California - Making sure your unpaid interns are not considered employeesFox Rothschild LLPCalifornia employers that have unpaid interns should take note of an opinion letter issued by the California Division of Labor Standards Enforcement on April 7, 2010.DOL clarifies and expands application of FMLA to "son or daughter"Reinhart Boerner Van Deuren SCThe DOL issued an Administrator? [read post]
26 Mar 2024, 6:52 am
² Sutton v. [read post]
11 Jan 2017, 7:19 am
California Public Employees’ Retirement System v. [read post]
27 Feb 2022, 4:30 pm
Media Law in Other Jurisdictions Australia On 24 February 2022, the Court of Appeal refused all fifteen grounds of appeal in Cheng v Pan; Cheng v Zhou [2022] NSWCA 21. [read post]
12 Jan 2009, 4:06 am
11th CircuitLewis v. [read post]
27 Apr 2017, 1:30 am
John's University School of LawKatherine Schostok, DePaul University College of LawAllison Winnike, University of Houston Law Center 5:00 – 7:00 PM Welcome Reception – Henson Atrium, Georgia State Law Friday, June 9, 20177:30 – 8:15 AM Registration & Breakfast – Henson Atrium, Georgia State Law 8:15 – 8:30 AM Opening Remarks – Ceremonial Courtroom, Georgia State LawWendy Hensel, Interim Dean and Professor of Law, Georgia State University College of… [read post]
26 Jul 2012, 2:45 pm
In Dana Ltd. v. [read post]
27 Mar 2019, 1:00 am
Pharmaceutical Pricing Jaime King, University of California Hastings College of the Law, The Burden of Federalism: Challenges to State Attempts at Controlling Prescription Drug Costs Marc Rodwin, Suffolk University Law School, Controlling Pharmaceutical Prices: What the U.S. [read post]
20 Jun 2014, 10:14 am
Shaw, 13-897, a state-on-top habeas case that asked whether, in an ineffective assistance claim, “a state appellate court’s holding that an omitted state law issue ultimately lacked merit precludes a federal habeas court from later finding either deficient performance or prejudice” under Strickland v. [read post]
13 Sep 2012, 5:41 pm
New York law is identical to Florida law on this point, as explained in Shaw Family Archives Ltd. v. [read post]
14 May 2012, 8:24 am
Mass. 1997)(occupational epidemiology of benzene exposure and benzene does not inform health effects from vanishingly low exposure to benzene in bottled water) Whiting v. [read post]
14 May 2020, 2:00 am
Schmidt, et al. v. [read post]
14 May 2020, 2:00 am
Schmidt, et al. v. [read post]
27 Jan 2017, 9:11 am
In Unum Group v. [read post]
27 Jan 2017, 9:11 am
In Unum Group v. [read post]
21 May 2018, 8:46 am
Greenwood and American Express Co. v. [read post]
11 Jul 2019, 8:50 am
Following the Illinois Supreme Court’s decision in Rosenbach v. [read post]
17 Oct 2008, 2:40 pm
(IP Dragon) Bad faith trade mark registrations: Sony Ericsson v Mr Lui (IPKat) In letter to Chinese government, Intellectual Property Owners Association (IPOA) weakens opposition to 'international exhaustion' (Hal Wegner) IP laws evolving in China (Law360) Colombia Colombia changes trade name deposit requirements (IP tango) FINESSE, MEN'S FITNESS confusingly similar, rules Colombia Council (IP tango) Denmark Court denies injunction request in… [read post]
15 Apr 2009, 4:44 am
So medical monitoring in California doesn't appear to be a completely independent cause of action. [read post]
9 Oct 2016, 4:07 pm
Last week in the Courts On 4 October 2016, there was an application in the case of Bode v Mundell, There was an application in the case of HCN v Chelsea & Westminster NHS Trust on 6 October 2016 As already mentioned, on 7 October 2016, Master McCloud handed down judgment in Malik v Trump [2016] EWHC 2011 (QB). [read post]
