Search for: "SHAW v. CALIFORNIA"
Results 281 - 300
of 326
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Oct 2009, 3:19 pm
Attorney for the Central District of California. [read post]
31 Aug 2009, 7:11 pm
Shaw (9th Cir. [read post]
22 Aug 2009, 8:33 am
The opinion is Rutti v. [read post]
20 Aug 2009, 8:28 pm
The Court of Appeal held in The Retirement Group v. [read post]
5 Aug 2009, 10:52 am
California Health & Welfare Agency, 704 F. 2d 1465, 1469 (9th Cir. 1983)). [read post]
28 Jul 2009, 6:31 am
The case is Boucher v. [read post]
28 Jul 2009, 1:26 am
Ouch.In Boucher v. [read post]
23 May 2009, 3:43 am
Because AT&T's pension payments accord with a bona fide seniority system's terms, they are insulated from challenge under Title VII §703(h).o May 18, 2009 decision hereo SCOTUS docket hereo SCOTUSwiki hereo Noted here: Reuters; Connecticut Employment Law Blog; Yahoo; WAPO; Christian Science Monitor; Bloomberg; Shaw Valenza; NYTimes; FYI: Central Ohio Employment Law Update; Ross Runkel; Paul Mollica; SCOTUSblog (opinion recap); Fisher… [read post]
15 Apr 2009, 4:44 am
So medical monitoring in California doesn't appear to be a completely independent cause of action. [read post]
25 Feb 2009, 11:53 am
Badgley and Nathan Jones In Shaw v. [read post]
18 Feb 2009, 9:27 am
California Coastal Comm'n (cert petition on Williamson County and Penn Central) Aspen Creek Estates, Ltd. v. [read post]
20 Jan 2009, 4:40 pm
In a lengthy (70 page) opinion, the California Court of Appeals (Sixth District), in Shaw v. [read post]
12 Jan 2009, 4:06 am
11th CircuitLewis v. [read post]
28 Dec 2008, 5:00 am
In Shaw v. [read post]
31 Oct 2008, 9:31 pm
McGuire Woods published New Major Decision Holds California Meal Period, Rest Period, Off-The-Clock And "Time Shaving" Wage Claims "Not Amenable To Class Treatment" Seyfarth Shaw wrote: Court Provides Better Meal Deal For California Employers If we didn't include your blog or firm alert on this list, you need to read up on Google's search algorithms. [read post]
23 Oct 2008, 8:28 pm
Preston and Rex v. [read post]
17 Oct 2008, 2:40 pm
(IP Dragon) Bad faith trade mark registrations: Sony Ericsson v Mr Lui (IPKat) In letter to Chinese government, Intellectual Property Owners Association (IPOA) weakens opposition to 'international exhaustion' (Hal Wegner) IP laws evolving in China (Law360) Colombia Colombia changes trade name deposit requirements (IP tango) FINESSE, MEN'S FITNESS confusingly similar, rules Colombia Council (IP tango) Denmark Court denies injunction request in… [read post]
12 Oct 2008, 1:00 pm
In Mells v. [read post]
2 Oct 2008, 4:27 am
Rost v. [read post]
24 Sep 2008, 9:08 pm
Note: This guest post is by Karl Neudorfer of Seyfarth Shaw, LLP, who was my cocounsel representing one of the defendants in the Taylor v. [read post]