Search for: "SHAW v. CALIFORNIA"
Results 161 - 180
of 328
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Oct 2008, 4:27 am
Rost v. [read post]
28 Jul 2009, 1:26 am
Ouch.In Boucher v. [read post]
30 Oct 2020, 11:41 am
Republicans Don’t Know What to Do with Their Bad-Faith ACA Case By Nicholas Bagley, Professor of Law, University of Michigan Law School Nicholas Bagley compares the vigorous support the first Supreme Court case against the Affordable Care Act garnered from the conservative establishment and Republican party against the far weaker backing for the current case, California v. [read post]
16 Feb 2022, 7:21 pm
California Inst. of Tech. v. [read post]
3 Nov 2014, 2:24 pm
Supreme Court in Mach Mining v. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 1:43 pm
He fills the vacancy created by the resignation of Judge Grant V. [read post]
21 Feb 2008, 7:20 am
In Combs v. [read post]
20 Dec 2012, 3:21 pm
See California Code of Civil Procedure section 2019.210. [read post]
20 Dec 2012, 3:21 pm
See California Code of Civil Procedure section 2019.210. [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 5:00 am
(Linder v. [read post]
11 May 2022, 1:48 pm
Cohen, 1972- author.2020 Oakland, California University of California PresseBookIntimate wars : the life and times of the woman who brought abortion from the back alley to the board room Merle Hoffman, 1946- 2012 New York City : Feminist Press at CUNY Print BookBeggars and choosers : how the politics of choice shapes adoption, abortion, and welfare in the United States Rickie Solinger, 1947- 2001 New York : Hill and Wang Law Reviews and MoreHundreds of law… [read post]
14 Jan 2010, 5:23 am
App. 1993); Shaw v. [read post]
25 Mar 2015, 3:08 pm
Icon-IP Pty Ltd. v. [read post]
29 Aug 2024, 8:10 am
Cal.). in Loggins v. [read post]
5 Nov 2019, 3:59 am
In the latest episode of Strict Scrutiny (podcast), Kate Shaw and Melissa Murray “talk breaking SCOTUS news; preview three cases from the upcoming November sitting — DACA, Hernandez v. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 5:11 pm
SHAW VALENZA LLP - http://shawvalenza.com [read post]
3 Jun 2014, 7:15 am
Shaw 13-897Issue: Whether, in a claim of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel, a state appellate court’s holding that an omitted state law issue ultimately lacked merit precludes a federal habeas court from later finding either deficient performance or prejudice relating to that omission under the standards of Strickland v. [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 5:00 am
Josh says likely not.I agree and think the answer is found in Inergy Propane, LLC v. [read post]
22 Jul 2010, 10:33 am
Biggs (2008) 170 Cal.App.4th 127 (upholding teacher layoffs despite less-qualified teachers remaining on the job as permitted by the Education Code); and Shaw v. [read post]
22 Jul 2010, 10:33 am
Biggs (2008) 170 Cal.App.4th 127 (upholding teacher layoffs despite less-qualified teachers remaining on the job as permitted by the Education Code); and Shaw v. [read post]
