Search for: "SIMMS v. STATE"
Results 41 - 60
of 89
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Sep 2007, 4:05 am
Simms v. [read post]
10 Apr 2007, 1:18 am
Supreme Court case Atkins v. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 6:46 am
Applying Simms [1999] UKHL 33, he found that general or ambiguous statutory words are incapable of overriding fundamental rights. [read post]
22 Jan 2010, 7:35 am
(Korsak v. [read post]
26 Apr 2013, 5:14 pm
R v Secretary of State for the Home Department ex parte Simms [2000] AC 115, 126E-G. [read post]
11 Dec 2010, 5:45 am
Co. of N.Y. v Simmes, 270 AD2d at 666). [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 6:21 am
SHIREY V. [read post]
1 Oct 2015, 7:13 am
Sachs, in which the court will determine when an entity is an “agent” of a “foreign state” under the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act, and Ocasio v. [read post]
20 Oct 2016, 4:31 pm
Lord Toulson noted the frequently quoted words of Lord Hoffmann in R v Secretary of State for the Home Office, Ex p Simms ([2000] 2 AC 115) that “Fundamental rights cannot be overridden by general or ambiguous words” and said importantly that “while Lord Hoffmann said that this presumption will apply “even” to the most general words, but I would say further that the more general the words, the harder it is likely to be to… [read post]
5 Jan 2019, 8:29 am
Simms, 2017 WL 6888499 (C.D. [read post]
8 Mar 2024, 6:02 pm
Like most Americans, I believe Roe v. [read post]
20 Oct 2016, 6:09 am
Lord Toulson noted the frequently quoted words of Lord Hoffmann in R v Secretary of State for the Home Office, Ex p Simms [2000] 2 AC 115 that “Fundamental rights cannot be overridden by general or ambiguous words” and said importantly that “while Lord Hoffmann said that this presumption will apply “even” to the most general words, but I would say further that the more general the words, the harder it is likely to be to rebut the… [read post]
12 Aug 2010, 3:50 am
Fleet St., Ltd., 148 F.3d 149, 171 (2d Cir.1998); Simms v. [read post]
11 Jan 2016, 1:33 pm
§9:4831(C). [6] Simms Hardin Co., LLC v. 3901 Ridgelake Drive, L.L.C., 12-469 (La. [read post]
29 Dec 2008, 9:00 pm
Last June, the United States Supreme Court determined that blank">Crawford v. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 2:51 pm
Skilled Criminal Defense Attorney Clayton Simms for the accused. [read post]
17 Sep 2011, 2:54 pm
Strickland v. [read post]
17 Sep 2011, 2:54 pm
Strickland v. [read post]
30 Oct 2014, 7:45 am
Nguyen v. [read post]
3 Oct 2016, 7:19 am
Accordingly, a nonunion job seeker was lawfully denied a referral because he refused to pay the fee charged by a union to use its exclusive hiring hall, the appeals court held, affirming the district court’s dismissal of his suit contending the fee was unlawful (Simms v. [read post]
