Search for: "SIMS v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA" Results 1 - 20 of 31
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Oct 2018, 10:43 am by Rory Little
” The government then offers detailed citations to show that in 1986 most states – 43 plus the District of Columbia – included some “types of mobile or nonpermanent homes” in their burglary statutes. [read post]
28 Aug 2008, 7:46 am
The District of Columbia Circuit adopted a contrary position, which Turnberry urges this Court to adopt. [read post]
7 Apr 2023, 9:30 pm by ernst
  Tejinder Singh, Sparacino PLLC; Sherally Munshi, Georgetown Law; and Sim J. [read post]
2 Dec 2015, 6:21 am by Guest Blogger
District Court for the District of Columbia, which the Supreme Court summarily affirmed. [read post]
Mar. 12, 2010)(Green) (med-mal suit, health care liability, agreement by agreed docket control order to extend deadline for expert report nullified)SPECTRUM HEALTHCARE RESOURCES, INC., AND MICHAEL SIMS v. [read post]
22 Aug 2007, 11:50 am
District of Columbia, 817 F.Supp. 148, 151 (D.D.C. 1993) (dismissing as duplicative claims against officials in their official capacity where municipality had been sued). [read post]
19 Apr 2018, 4:43 pm by Aurora Barnes
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit’s judgment and instruct that court to remand the case to the district court with directions to dismiss all claims for prospective relief regarding pregnant unaccompanied minors. [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 9:18 am by William A. Ruskin
Zeigler, a partner with Bass Berry & Sims PLC in Nashville, Tennessee. [read post]
19 Apr 2018, 12:38 pm by John Elwood
Sims, 17-766, out of the U.S. [read post]
1 Mar 2015, 8:14 pm by J. Gordon Hylton
In only five other jurisdictions—District of Columbia, Hawaii, New York, Rhode Island, and Vermont—did the re-elected president do better than he did in Maryland. [read post]
25 May 2009, 5:20 pm
  US Trademarks USTrademarkExchange.com: New web service for sale of registered trade marks (IP finance) Think outside the trademark box – staying on top of recent developments in other areas of IP law can help trade mark owners be more strategic in trying cases (Managing Intellectual Property)   US Trade Marks – Decisions Court of Appeal for District of Columbia affirms laches ruling dismissing REDSKINS cancellation: Pro-Football v… [read post]
30 Nov 2009, 12:00 am
Budejovicky Budvar Narodni Podnik v Anheuser-Busch Inc (Class 46) (IPKat) EPO: Should green technology be subject to compulsory licensing? [read post]
18 May 2009, 5:24 am
’ (China Law Blog)   Europe ECJ finds similar marks on wine and glasses not likely to cause confusion: Waterford Wedgewood plc v Assembled Investments (Proprietary) Ltd, OHIM (Class 46) (IPKat) AG Colomer opines in Maple leaf trade mark battle: joined cases American Clothing Associates SA v OHIM and OHIM v American Clothing Associates SA (IPKat) (Excess Copyright) CFI: Restitutio and time limits: how does the law stand now for CTMs? [read post]