Search for: "SMITH v. OKLAHOMA CITY" Results 21 - 40 of 112
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jan 2022, 12:35 pm by John Elwood
Smith, and if so, whether the Supreme Court should overrule Smith. [read post]
4 Aug 2021, 3:08 am by Brett Holubeck
City of Philadelphia Last term there were three different cases that dealt with religious issues and the law. [read post]
18 Oct 2018, 7:04 am by John Elwood
§ 1498(a) for the eminent domain taking of a patent license by the government is a suit for patent “infringement” under the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act. [read post]
8 Apr 2020, 6:50 am by Andrew Hamm
Smith 19-1106Issues: (1) Whether the U.S. [read post]
20 Jan 2022, 2:01 pm by John Elwood
City of Fredericksburg, 21-164, which the court had considered at eight consecutive conferences. [read post]
14 Sep 2016, 8:03 am by Eric Baxter
Smith did modify – without overruling – the Warren Court’s Sherbert v. [read post]
14 Mar 2018, 4:05 am by Edith Roberts
Supreme Court could ‘radically’ upend state civil, regulatory and criminal jurisdiction in eastern Oklahoma, including the city of Tulsa. [read post]
7 Oct 2015, 3:28 am
District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma:  U.S. v. [read post]
3 Sep 2009, 8:33 pm
Rosenbaum of Reed Smith on the firm's blog, Legal Bytes Amazon.com's Objection to Proposed Settlement in "Authors Guild v. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 1:06 pm by Behr, McCarter & Potter, P.C.
Smith Interior Design Group, Inc., 310 S.W.3d 227, 233 (Mo.banc 2010).Here, Frazee knew he was dealing with an Oklahoma bank when he signed the guarantee. [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Yahoo News – Michael Bender and Anjali Huynh (New York Times) | Published: 11/29/2023 Since the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. [read post]
14 May 2007, 8:03 am
City of Union, 06-1226) ** A test case on the power of the federal government to regulate or even ban dietary supplements. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 9:39 am by John Elwood
  One moved out: The Court denied without recorded dissent in two-time relist Smith v. [read post]