Search for: "SPRIGGS v. STATE"
Results 1 - 20
of 40
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Sep 2017, 7:46 am
Spriggs v. [read post]
10 Aug 2015, 12:56 pm
Criminal procedure — Motion to suppress evidence — Prior bad acts Following a jury trial in the Circuit Court for Anne Arundel County, appellant, Charles Spriggs, was convicted of first-degree murder, use of a firearm in the commission of a crime of violence, carrying a handgun, and conspiracy to commit first-degree murder. [read post]
3 May 2017, 7:21 am
Criminal prosecution — Jury instruction — Voluntary intoxication Appellant, Francis Spriggs, was tried and convicted by a jury in the Circuit Court for Prince George’s County of three counts each of second-degree assault, use of a firearm in the commission of a crime of violence, reckless endangerment, and various weapons offenses. [read post]
28 Jun 2016, 8:00 am
Criminal procedure — Motion to suppress evidence — Vehicle search At the conclusion of a bench trial in the Circuit Court for Dorchester County, Vernon Harvey Spriggs, appellant, was found guilty of possession of cocaine with intent to distribute, possession of marijuana with intent to distribute, simple possession of cocaine, and simple possession of marijuana. ... [read post]
12 Mar 2014, 6:19 am
This is because the statute specifically states the telephone must be used in a manner that allows for `hands-free listening and talking. [read post]
11 Jan 2012, 5:36 am
” United States v. [read post]
11 Jan 2012, 11:49 am
United States v. [read post]
17 Nov 2008, 2:00 pm
It is empirically settled: Cantwell v Connecticut is the most influential United States Supreme Court case of all time; Branzburg v Hayes is the most well-grounded. [read post]
16 May 2019, 4:21 pm
Sometimes, to briefly state the facts of the case is sufficient itself to state the appropriate holding:"A vexatious litigant’s request to sue his attorneys for legal malpractice was denied by the superior court, as was his motion for reconsideration of that request. [read post]
2 Apr 2013, 11:55 am
The author of Section 23123 expressly stated that it applied only to "holding a cell phone up to [one's] ear." [read post]
13 Jan 2012, 5:58 am
U.S. v. [read post]
The Use of a Peer-to-Peer File Sharing Program and Enhancement Under the Federal Sentence Guidelines
25 Jan 2012, 4:20 pm
In United States v. [read post]
3 Apr 2011, 3:10 am
In Davis v. [read post]
28 Mar 2015, 7:49 am
First, on February 20, 2015, it denied certiorari in State v. [read post]
8 Dec 2016, 7:12 am
State, Williams v. [read post]
8 Dec 2016, 7:12 am
State, Williams v. [read post]
11 Sep 2012, 9:12 am
Sprigg. [read post]
14 Oct 2016, 8:12 am
See also, United States v. [read post]
14 May 2018, 7:17 am
Seyfarth Synopsis: In Sali v. [read post]
23 Jan 2007, 6:31 am
State, New York Times v. [read post]
