Search for: "SSA (Court Use Only)" Results 41 - 60 of 289
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 May 2021, 9:06 am by Lloyd Bemis
The SSA recognizes Asthma in its Blue Book under Section 3.03. [read post]
5 May 2021, 10:47 am by Greg Reed
If an applicant uses a wheelchair or another mobility device that requires using only one hand, it is not a basis for a disabling impairment. [read post]
28 Feb 2021, 6:33 pm by Dennis Crouch
  If you focus only on decisional authority, then Arthrex has a case that these are Officers requiring presidential appointment. [read post]
22 Feb 2021, 10:18 am by CharlesB
There are four levels of appeal: Request for Reconsideration (SSA-561-U2), Request for Hearing by Administrative Law Judge (HA-501-U5), or Request for Review of Hearing Decision/Order (HA-520-U5) Federal Court review. [read post]
17 Feb 2021, 7:33 am by David Post
[You may have seen stories about the operation of Facebook's new and innovative "Supreme Court. [read post]
Likewise, the SSA site has a test link whereby one can test their device ahead of time to ensure it will interact correctly with the Microsoft Office Teams video service. [read post]
9 Dec 2020, 4:05 pm by Amy Howe
Justice Neil Gorsuch told Thompson that his request to have the court invalidate the 2012 agreement was a “big one” and “hard for us to swallow. [read post]
30 Nov 2020, 12:14 pm by Dennis Crouch
Rodriguez is a closely parallel case of an SSA employee who conducted personal searches on the SSA databases. [read post]
20 Nov 2020, 6:03 am by Greg Reed
For a child, the SSA defines disability as a mental or physical condition that seriously limits activities. [read post]
19 Nov 2020, 12:18 pm by erin
Contact us today, and we’ll get started on your case. [read post]
15 Oct 2020, 7:26 am by Cyberleagle
Data could be used for a wide variety of criminal investigations. [read post]
15 Aug 2020, 11:36 am by Bona Law PC
This is the prong where district courts have been struggling when ruling on their motions to dismiss, mainly because Justice Souter’s opinion in Twombly included some language from the landmark summary-judgment decision (Matsushita) that the Court used to explain why in conscious parallelism cases, plaintiffs’ “offer of conspiracy evidence must tend to rule out the possibility that the defendants were acting independently. [read post]
6 May 2020, 11:04 am by Jessica C. Diamond
Not only does this published decision reaffirm the holding of Golian and reject the Gilligan case, a trial court opinion which on which the trial judge improperly relied, but it also serves as an important reminder to all of us attorneys:  before you rely on a case (especially a trial court case!) [read post]
8 Apr 2020, 7:34 am by kristine.welters@thomsonreuters.com
  Also, LINA did not provide the SSA ALJ’s decision, the SSA claims file, or Plaintiff’s medical, vocational, and lay witness evidence. [read post]