Search for: "STANFORD v. STATE"
Results 1 - 20
of 2,121
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Dec 2023, 12:47 pm
’” The chief justice mentioned the O’Connors’ move to Phoenix, where they had three sons, and Sandra Day O’Connor opened a law practice before entering state government and then Arizona politics and eventually that state bench. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 10:55 am
Even so, Stanford’s Transparency Index states that Big Tech’s foundation models fail to meet the EU AI Act’s transparency requirements. [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 3:45 pm
But, at least for now, she was also a last: the last Justice to have held elective public office (as a state senator, and first female majority leader of a state senate). [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 11:24 am
United States (1992), which established the rule that the Tenth Amendment bars federal "commandeering" of state governments. [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 11:21 am
Casey and Bush v. [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 11:03 am
Casey (1992), Virginia v. [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 7:23 am
Encountering barriers as a young female lawyer In September 1946, then 16-year-old Sandra Day enrolled at Stanford. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 4:00 am
Whenever I teach the federalism portion of my first-year constitutional law course, at least one cynical (but clever) student observes that the juxtaposition between United States v. [read post]
23 Nov 2023, 6:30 am
Tanner Allread, Stanford University, has posted The Specter of Indian Removal: The Persistence of State Supremacy Arguments in Federal Indian Law, which appears in the Columbia Law Review:In the 2022 case of Oklahoma v. [read post]
21 Nov 2023, 11:48 am
In 1987, the Washington Court of Appeals considered, and denied, the admissibility of violent writings as evidence; however, courts did not consider the specific question of rap lyrics until the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit heard United States v. [read post]
21 Nov 2023, 11:48 am
In 1987, the Washington Court of Appeals considered, and denied, the admissibility of violent writings as evidence; however, courts did not consider the specific question of rap lyrics until the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit heard United States v. [read post]
17 Nov 2023, 5:37 am
In Grigson v. [read post]
15 Nov 2023, 4:41 pm
Also includes articles on Native American law in the Supreme CourtBoldt Decision — United States v. [read post]
15 Nov 2023, 6:30 am
Though later disparaged in the era of Erie Railroad Co. v. [read post]
7 Nov 2023, 8:00 am
Johnson Fellow:“A Legal Form of Marriage”: The Legality of Queer Families in the United States, 1830-1920 Anin Luo, Princeton University Empathizing beyond Humanity: The 1970s Emergence of Personhood for Animals and the Environment Robyn Morse, University of Virginia, John Wertheimer/Davidson College Fellow: Enterprising Value: Labor Transitions and Legal Maneuvers During the Rise of the Oil Economy in Bahrain Wallace Teska, Stanford University, William… [read post]
23 Oct 2023, 12:00 am
The DfE responded to the investigation by stating it would not be appropriate to comment on individual cases. [read post]
20 Oct 2023, 2:23 pm
[What Swift v. [read post]
11 Oct 2023, 9:25 am
”[12] Importantly, there is no presumption of cost reasonableness.[13] If an initial review of the facts results in the Government challenging a specific cost, the contractor has the burden to prove that the cost is reasonable.[14] The FAR provides that whether a cost is reasonable depends on a “variety of considerations and circumstances,” including the following: Whether it is the type of cost generally recognized as ordinary and necessary for the conduct of the… [read post]
10 Oct 2023, 4:44 pm
In Murray v. [read post]
9 Oct 2023, 11:19 am
Barton “Buzz” Thompson served as special master for the United States Supreme Court in Montana v. [read post]
