Search for: "STANFORD v. STATE"
Results 1 - 20
of 2,147
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm
A year ago, almost to the day, my (co-authored) Verdict column focused on the lessons to be learned from a high-profile and boisterous protest by Stanford Law School students at a Federalist Society Speaker Event featuring Judge Kyle Duncan, a conservative Trump-appointed judge on the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court issued the decision in Roe v. [read post]
12 Apr 2024, 6:30 am
Gubler (Arizona State University), on Monday, April 8, 2024 Tags: corporate boards, corporate law, directors, Fiduciary duties, Shareholder value, Stakeholders Delaware Supreme Court Holds Entire Fairness Applicable to All Conflicted Controller Transactions Posted by Gregory V. [read post]
12 Apr 2024, 6:30 am
Gubler (Arizona State University), on Monday, April 8, 2024 Tags: corporate boards, corporate law, directors, Fiduciary duties, Shareholder value, Stakeholders Delaware Supreme Court Holds Entire Fairness Applicable to All Conflicted Controller Transactions Posted by Gregory V. [read post]
7 Apr 2024, 4:37 pm
United States The United States District Court for the Northern District of California issued its decision to grant the Center for Countering Digital Hate’s (CCDH) motion to strike out under an anti-SLAPP statute in the case of X CCDH. [read post]
5 Apr 2024, 9:30 pm
Congratulations to Bethany Berger upon her receipt of the Perry Zirkel ’76 Distinguished Teaching Award at UConn Law (UConn Today).Christine Lamberson, Director, Federal Judicial History Office, has a post on Chy Lung v. [read post]
20 Mar 2024, 8:24 pm
As CISA Director Jen Easterly noted to the New York Times,[15] the most “critical infrastructure” of the United States is our cognitive infrastructure – the framework and tools by which citizens examine and analyze reality. [read post]
16 Mar 2024, 9:31 pm
Another canard Stanford dispels relates to supposed statements by Renee DiResta, research manager at Stanford University (and a board member of Tech Policy Press). [read post]
15 Mar 2024, 3:17 am
Notably, Stanford scholars point out potential repercussions on complementary markets, modestly masking the AI landscape’s profound contours. [read post]
13 Mar 2024, 7:20 am
Working Arrangements Across Employment Sectors by Percentage of Workers In their own survey, Barrero et al. measured the full-time working arrangements in the United States as of 2023, identifying the percentage of employees who work fully onsite, fully remote, and those who have a hybrid arrangement. [read post]
12 Mar 2024, 3:00 pm
The brief by the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), the ACLU of Nevada, the EFF, Stanford Internet Observatory Research Scholar Riana Pfefferkorn, and six other organizations asks the court to reject a request by Nevada’s attorney general to stop Meta from offering end-to-end encryption by default to Facebook Messenger users under 18 in the state. [read post]
11 Mar 2024, 3:24 pm
I then spot checked to clean up situations where the “William” v. [read post]
11 Mar 2024, 3:24 pm
I then spot checked to clean up situations where the “William” v. [read post]
11 Mar 2024, 3:24 pm
I then spot checked to clean up situations where the “William” v. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 9:37 am
Supreme Court’s 2022 Dobbs decision, which overturned Roe v. [read post]
1 Mar 2024, 4:17 pm
In Kejriwal v. [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 5:50 am
After all, as Oona Hathaway, Maggie Mills, and Thomas Poston note in their forthcoming Stanford Law Review article, “Ukraine’s most powerful asset in the war has been its capacity to demonstrate time and again that it is consistently on the right side of the law against an opponent bent on breaking every rule on the books. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 3:37 am
And don’t get me started on the Reasonably Scared Cop Rule of Graham v. [read post]
22 Feb 2024, 2:04 pm
That is, after all, what the text of the Impeachment Clause actually states. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 5:51 pm
In 1995 the Court identified state interests that might justify the rules. [read post]
