Search for: "STANFORD v. STATE"
Results 201 - 220
of 1,991
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jun 2023, 9:30 pm
" The recording of the Supreme Court Historical Society’s commemoration of Juneteenth, a “conversation on the lynching of Ed Johnson in 1906 and United States v. [read post]
22 Jun 2023, 9:05 pm
Grundfest at Stanford University Law School. [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 5:25 am
Frankel quotes Stanford Law School Professor Joseph Grundfest as saying that there “is no such thing” as a federal derivative action under Section 14(a). [read post]
17 Jun 2023, 4:30 pm
(Justice Barrett readily cited California v. [read post]
14 Jun 2023, 6:30 am
I first became aware of this in a brilliant essay by Stanford historian Jonathan Gnienapp that was published in a book that I edited on nullification and secession in contemporary constitutional theory. [read post]
9 Jun 2023, 3:30 am
Stated differently, these derivative suits concern internal corporate affairs—matters that are traditionally governed by state corporate law and, therefore, more sensibly litigated in the Delaware Chancery. [read post]
8 Jun 2023, 9:29 am
Before the United States Supreme Court handed down its recent 8-to-1 decision in Glacier Northwest v. [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 12:33 pm
Beardsley Professor of Law, EmeritusThe Glacier v. [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 12:24 pm
In Slack v. [read post]
28 May 2023, 6:00 am
Brown v. [read post]
26 May 2023, 10:54 am
Supreme Court decision Sackett v EPA overturns a decision from the U.S. [read post]
24 May 2023, 10:16 am
Here, Professor Buzz Thompson, a global expert on water and natural resources who has served as Special Master for the United States Supreme Court in Montana v. [read post]
19 May 2023, 2:30 pm
Taamneh and a companion case, Gonzalez v. [read post]
15 May 2023, 6:00 am
The abstract:The Supreme Court’s decision last Term in Castro-Huerta v. [read post]
12 May 2023, 8:55 am
Brett Parker (Stanford University - Department of Political Science) has posted Polarization in State Supreme Courts, 1980-2020 on SSRN. [read post]
4 May 2023, 9:05 pm
Among the most authoritative sources cherry-picked by the AGs is a well-regarded Stanford Law Review article by Schanzenbach and Sitkoff.[6] As the Kentucky AG notes when citing this piece of scholarship, “ESG investing is an ‘umbrella term that refers to an investment strategy that emphasizes a firm’s governance structure or the environmental or social impacts of the firm’s products or practices. [read post]
4 May 2023, 4:00 am
By Eric SegallTwenty years ago, Justice Sandra Day O'Connor wrote the following in Grutter v. [read post]
Do Law Schools Truly Have to Worry About Students Not Being Able to Handle Real-World Disagreements?
20 Apr 2023, 10:26 am
During an oral argument at the Supreme Court, Justice Neil Gorsuch initiated this bizarre exchange, as reported in Slate:During oral arguments in 303 Creative v. [read post]
19 Apr 2023, 11:30 am
Times Co. v. [read post]
18 Apr 2023, 10:09 am
Yes, constitutional law has been used to oppress Native people, but at the same time, we want to bring to the fore how Native arguments led, for example, to seminal cases such as Worcester v. [read post]
