Search for: "STANFORD v. STATE"
Results 241 - 260
of 2,029
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Nov 2022, 12:35 pm
Stanford and the other Ivies will probably follow. [read post]
13 Nov 2022, 9:00 pm
As an article on NBC.com noted, “For decades, it was the Republican Party that benefited from conservative anger over the Supreme Court’s original ruling in Roe v. [read post]
9 Nov 2022, 10:22 am
United States Supreme Court Gonzalez v Google and Twitter v Taamneh. [read post]
7 Nov 2022, 1:44 am
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: (As of 11/11/22) The Law Debenture Trust Corporation plc v Ukraine (Represented by the Minister of Finance of Ukraine acting upon the instructions of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine) Nos. 2 and 3, heard 9-12 December 2019 East of England Ambulance Service NHS Trust v Flowers and Ors, heard 22 June 2021 Fearn and others v Board of Trustees of the Tate Gallery heard 7th December 2021… [read post]
3 Nov 2022, 4:12 am
The focus of the letter is the fact that Barrett voted with the majority in the Dobbs decision to overturn Roe v. [read post]
31 Oct 2022, 3:08 am
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: (As of 02/11/22) The Law Debenture Trust Corporation plc v Ukraine (Represented by the Minister of Finance of Ukraine acting upon the instructions of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine) Nos. 2 and 3, heard 9-12 December 2019 East of England Ambulance Service NHS Trust v Flowers and Ors, heard 22 June 2021 Fearn and others v Board of Trustees of the Tate Gallery heard 7th December 2021… [read post]
29 Oct 2022, 3:44 pm
ShareNearly 100 amicus briefs were filed in Students for Fair Admissions v. the University of North Carolina and Students for Fair Admissions v. [read post]
29 Oct 2022, 5:57 am
The focus of the letter is the fact that Barrett voted with the majority in the Dobbs decision to overturn Roe v. [read post]
25 Oct 2022, 9:30 pm
DRE]The Stanford Center for Law and History will invite paper submissions from graduate students for its fifth annual conference, “Legal Histories of the Body and the State: Dobbs and the Legacies of Regulating Gender and Sex. [read post]
24 Oct 2022, 1:55 am
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: (As of 20/10/22) The Law Debenture Trust Corporation plc v Ukraine (Represented by the Minister of Finance of Ukraine acting upon the instructions of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine) Nos. 2 and 3, heard 9-12 December 2019 East of England Ambulance Service NHS Trust v Flowers and Ors, heard 22 June 2021 Fearn and others v Board of Trustees of the Tate Gallery heard 7th December 2021… [read post]
23 Oct 2022, 8:56 am
The complaint in Schmitt v. [read post]
17 Oct 2022, 12:25 pm
Václav Bartuška, the Czech ambassador-at-large for Energy Security.. [read post]
17 Oct 2022, 1:34 am
Reference by the Attorney General for Northern Ireland – Abortion Services (Safe Access Zones) (Northern Ireland) Bill, heard 19th July 2022 R (on the application of VIP Communications Ltd (In Liquidation)) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 4th October 2022 McCue (as guardian for Andrew McCue) (AP) v Glasgow City Council, heard 18th October 2022 Unger and another (in substitution for Hasan) v Ul-Hasan (deceased) and another, heard… [read post]
15 Oct 2022, 7:52 am
At the Stanford Trust & Safety conference, I heard a presentation of this paper: Helen Shuxuan Zeng, Brett Danaher, & Michael D. [read post]
14 Oct 2022, 9:30 pm
It is rare for a seven-year-old law review article to prompt much debate, but with the Indian Child Welfare Act before the Supreme Court this term (in Brackeen v. [read post]
11 Oct 2022, 9:22 am
Ablavsky is a law professor at Stanford. [read post]
11 Oct 2022, 5:01 am
Willson v. [read post]
10 Oct 2022, 1:44 pm
On the docket for the United States Supreme Court this term is Gonzalez v. [read post]
10 Oct 2022, 1:00 am
Reference by the Attorney General for Northern Ireland – Abortion Services (Safe Access Zones) (Northern Ireland) Bill, heard 19th July 2022 R (on the application of VIP Communications Ltd (In Liquidation)) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 4th October 2022 of DCM (Optical Holdings) v Commissioners for His Majesty’s Revenue and Customs, heard 12th October 2022. [read post]
5 Oct 2022, 4:20 am
On Tuesday 4th October, the Court heard the case of R (on the application of VIP Communications Ltd (In Liquidation)) v Secretary of State for the Home Department. [read post]
