Search for: "STANFORD v. STATE"
Results 261 - 280
of 2,035
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Oct 2022, 9:30 pm
It is rare for a seven-year-old law review article to prompt much debate, but with the Indian Child Welfare Act before the Supreme Court this term (in Brackeen v. [read post]
11 Oct 2022, 9:22 am
Ablavsky is a law professor at Stanford. [read post]
11 Oct 2022, 5:01 am
Willson v. [read post]
10 Oct 2022, 1:44 pm
On the docket for the United States Supreme Court this term is Gonzalez v. [read post]
10 Oct 2022, 1:00 am
Reference by the Attorney General for Northern Ireland – Abortion Services (Safe Access Zones) (Northern Ireland) Bill, heard 19th July 2022 R (on the application of VIP Communications Ltd (In Liquidation)) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 4th October 2022 of DCM (Optical Holdings) v Commissioners for His Majesty’s Revenue and Customs, heard 12th October 2022. [read post]
5 Oct 2022, 4:20 am
On Tuesday 4th October, the Court heard the case of R (on the application of VIP Communications Ltd (In Liquidation)) v Secretary of State for the Home Department. [read post]
4 Oct 2022, 9:01 pm
” Perales won League of United Latin American Citizens v. [read post]
4 Oct 2022, 1:27 pm
The Supreme Court decided Brown v. [read post]
3 Oct 2022, 12:10 pm
Here is the abstract: On October 11, 2022, the Supreme Court will hear a case, National Pork Producers Council v. [read post]
3 Oct 2022, 12:04 pm
See Schulz v. [read post]
19 Sep 2022, 2:15 pm
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit’s ruling on content moderation in NetChoice v. [read post]
19 Sep 2022, 12:10 pm
David Alan Sklansky (Stanford University) has posted The Neglected Origins of the Hearsay Rule in American Slavery: Recovering Queen v. [read post]
14 Sep 2022, 9:30 pm
David Alan Sklansky, Stanford Law School, has posted The Neglected Origins of the Hearsay Rule in American Slavery: Recovering Queen v. [read post]
12 Sep 2022, 12:30 pm
Ct. 1614, 1618 (2022) (Barrett, J.); United States v. [read post]
9 Sep 2022, 3:09 pm
Garland (2022) (Barrett, J.); United States v. [read post]
26 Aug 2022, 9:30 pm
The amicus brief of the Organization of American Historians in Brackeen v. [read post]
26 Aug 2022, 9:05 pm
In cases such as Bigelow v. [read post]
26 Aug 2022, 6:30 am
Birnbaum, and Haimavathi V. [read post]
26 Aug 2022, 6:30 am
Birnbaum, and Haimavathi V. [read post]
25 Aug 2022, 1:35 pm
Gelbach states his claim in the context of discussing a single randomized controlled trial (ASCOT-LLA), but his broad pronouncements are carelessly framed such that others may take them to apply to a single observational study, with its greater threats to internal validity. [read post]
