Search for: "STANFORD v. STATE"
Results 281 - 300
of 2,149
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 May 2016, 6:24 pm
One issue the majority ignored in Stanford is the future interest assignment rule created by the Federal Circuit in Filmtec Corp. v. [read post]
16 Apr 2007, 6:41 pm
Tomorrow, in Sole v. [read post]
2 Dec 2006, 8:16 am
The following argument recap was written by Jennifer Liu of the Stanford Supreme Court Litigation Clinic. [read post]
13 Jan 2009, 12:40 pm
Mirzayance (07-1315), Stanford student Ruthie Zemel prepared this preview. [read post]
5 Nov 2008, 9:46 pm
Here is the abstract:In Edwards v. [read post]
23 Jan 2008, 6:10 am
Instead of protecting the collective rights of the people in the states, Barnett maintains that Ninth Amendment protects only individual rights and cites as critical support the opposition views of the antifederalist Virginia Senate and the majority opinion in Chisholm v. [read post]
22 Jun 2007, 10:09 am
That is because the Apprendi majority has continued -- both in this Term's decision in Cunningham v. [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 9:18 am
The decision this week came in No. 09-1159, Board of Trustees of Leland Stanford Junior University v. [read post]
2 Dec 2020, 10:39 am
In Stanford v. [read post]
6 Jun 2011, 9:15 pm
Maggie McKinley (Stanford University Law School) has posted Plenary No Longer: How the Fourteenth Amendment 'Amended' Congressional Jurisdiction-Stripping Power (Stanford Law Review, Vol. 63, pp. 1213-1243, May 2011) on SSRN. [read post]
15 Nov 2023, 6:30 am
Though later disparaged in the era of Erie Railroad Co. v. [read post]
20 Dec 2023, 2:18 pm
On a recent episode of the Stanford Law School podcast, Stanford Legal, co-host Pam Karlan discussed the national abortion rights landscape after Dobbs v. [read post]
15 Nov 2007, 5:17 am
Joseph Grundfest (Stanford University Law School) has posted The Wizard of Oz, the United States Constitution, and Corporate Governance on SSRN. [read post]
3 Jul 2015, 7:33 am
The certified question concerns an issue of state law that no on-point precedent from the Supreme Court of Texas has resolved (Janvey v. [read post]
11 Jun 2008, 2:53 pm
Quoting Connick v. [read post]
20 Mar 2007, 4:13 pm
DeChristoforo, Darden v. [read post]
8 Dec 2008, 2:24 pm
United States and O’Neal v. [read post]
8 Sep 2021, 7:48 am
The Supreme Court held in Lujan v. [read post]
12 Oct 2017, 6:32 am
Leidos, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Jan 2009, 8:15 am
Stanford student Scott Noveck discusses oral argument in Kansas v. [read post]
