Search for: "STANFORD v. STATE" Results 41 - 60 of 2,029
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jul 2024, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman and Linda C. McClain
The calls to repeal no-fault divorce are nonsensical, but they result from the sexist attitudes that drove the overruling of Roe v. [read post]
24 Jul 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Across the interbellum era, Americans not only debated the Constitution, laid down vital precedents, and helped fashion the framework of constitutional law; they not only claimed that the Constitution carried certain meanings or led to certain results on federal power, state police power, Cherokee autonomy, or the fate of slavery; in a broader sense, they confronted the problem of constitutional inheritance itself. [read post]
15 Jul 2024, 9:35 pm by David Oscar Markus
A terrific criminal defense lawyer and my good friend, Sean Hecker, is here to discuss the wild trial of United States v. [read post]
15 Jul 2024, 4:44 pm by Adam Klasfeld
“In fact, on numerous occasions, President Nixon expressly stated that he did not contest these points. [read post]
8 Jul 2024, 9:01 pm by Austin Sarat
Wade and removed constitutional protections for reproductive freedom, the process of amending state constitutions has activated and engaged citizens all over the country.The amendment process, whether at the state or federal level, is an important expression of what Larry Kramer of Stanford University calls “popular constitutionalism. [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 2:01 pm by Eric Goldman
Vullo decision, where it held that the NRA had stated a claim for impermissible censorship due to government jawboning. [read post]
Instead, most states authorize the attorney general of the state to oversee and enforce charitable trusts. [read post]
Banks also recently wrote an essay for Stanford Lawyer about the unanimous decision, which held that state-mandated segregation of public schools violated the 14th amendment of the United States Constitution. [read post]
22 May 2024, 9:20 am by Dennis Crouch
This issue was discussed by Justice Breyer in his Stanford v. [read post]