Search for: "STANFORD v. STATE"
Results 41 - 60
of 2,151
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jan 2024, 9:30 pm
Stanford Law School's profile of Jud Campbell, who recently joined its faculty (Stanford Lawyer). [read post]
10 Jan 2024, 1:27 am
Karlan Kenneth and Harle Montgomery Professor of Public Interest Law Stanford Law School Jon D. [read post]
4 Jan 2024, 10:03 am
She chose Stanford Law School. [read post]
31 Dec 2023, 8:30 am
Brennen: Race Conscious Affirmative Action by Tax Exempt 501(c)(3) Institutions After Students for Fair Admissions v. [read post]
22 Dec 2023, 9:30 pm
Supreme Court case, Relentless Inc. v. [read post]
20 Dec 2023, 2:18 pm
On a recent episode of the Stanford Law School podcast, Stanford Legal, co-host Pam Karlan discussed the national abortion rights landscape after Dobbs v. [read post]
15 Dec 2023, 12:30 pm
Under the Supreme Court's ruling in McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 12:47 pm
’” The chief justice mentioned the O’Connors’ move to Phoenix, where they had three sons, and Sandra Day O’Connor opened a law practice before entering state government and then Arizona politics and eventually that state bench. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 10:55 am
Even so, Stanford’s Transparency Index states that Big Tech’s foundation models fail to meet the EU AI Act’s transparency requirements. [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 3:45 pm
But, at least for now, she was also a last: the last Justice to have held elective public office (as a state senator, and first female majority leader of a state senate). [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 11:24 am
United States (1992), which established the rule that the Tenth Amendment bars federal "commandeering" of state governments. [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 11:21 am
Casey and Bush v. [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 11:03 am
Casey (1992), Virginia v. [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 7:23 am
Encountering barriers as a young female lawyer In September 1946, then 16-year-old Sandra Day enrolled at Stanford. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 4:00 am
Whenever I teach the federalism portion of my first-year constitutional law course, at least one cynical (but clever) student observes that the juxtaposition between United States v. [read post]
23 Nov 2023, 6:30 am
Tanner Allread, Stanford University, has posted The Specter of Indian Removal: The Persistence of State Supremacy Arguments in Federal Indian Law, which appears in the Columbia Law Review:In the 2022 case of Oklahoma v. [read post]
21 Nov 2023, 11:48 am
In 1987, the Washington Court of Appeals considered, and denied, the admissibility of violent writings as evidence; however, courts did not consider the specific question of rap lyrics until the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit heard United States v. [read post]
21 Nov 2023, 11:48 am
In 1987, the Washington Court of Appeals considered, and denied, the admissibility of violent writings as evidence; however, courts did not consider the specific question of rap lyrics until the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit heard United States v. [read post]
17 Nov 2023, 5:37 am
In Grigson v. [read post]
15 Nov 2023, 4:41 pm
Also includes articles on Native American law in the Supreme CourtBoldt Decision — United States v. [read post]
