Search for: "STANFORD v. STATE"
Results 41 - 60
of 2,121
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jul 2023, 5:09 am
Think, perhaps, of the case of Obergefell v. [read post]
11 Jul 2023, 1:50 pm
Stanford Law Professor Michael McConnellMcConnell is the Richard and Frances Mallery Professor and Director of the Constitutional Law Center at Stanford Law School, a Senior Fellow at the Hoover Institution, and a former Judge on the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit. [read post]
10 Jul 2023, 7:38 am
Biden v. [read post]
7 Jul 2023, 9:05 pm
Under this theory, the Supreme Court held in American Electric Power v. [read post]
7 Jul 2023, 1:03 pm
Candidate, Stanford University), Nicholas T. [read post]
7 Jul 2023, 9:43 am
The lawsuit, National Veterans Legal Services Program, et al. v. [read post]
4 Jul 2023, 9:01 pm
Griswold v. [read post]
4 Jul 2023, 11:59 am
Co. v. [read post]
1 Jul 2023, 4:44 am
Tanner Allread (Stanford University) writes about "Brackeen and the Value of Careful History. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 2:43 pm
Supreme Court upheld the Indian Child Welfare Act (ICWA), in Haaland v. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 3:16 pm
Consider the Court’s 1978 decision in Bakke (Regents of the University of California v. [read post]
28 Jun 2023, 11:00 am
Tanner Allread On June 15, Indian Country breathed a collective sigh of relief when the Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of the Indian Child Welfare Act in Haaland v. [read post]
27 Jun 2023, 9:01 pm
Congress has been very clear in the federal securities laws when it intends to preempt state law, such as in the National Securities Markets Improvement Act[44] or the Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act.[45] Indeed, such a broad claim of Commission authority might raise issues under the major questions doctrine discussed in West Virginia v. [read post]
27 Jun 2023, 2:14 pm
Today, the Court resolved the question in Counterman v. [read post]
23 Jun 2023, 9:30 pm
" The recording of the Supreme Court Historical Society’s commemoration of Juneteenth, a “conversation on the lynching of Ed Johnson in 1906 and United States v. [read post]
22 Jun 2023, 9:05 pm
Grundfest at Stanford University Law School. [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 5:25 am
Frankel quotes Stanford Law School Professor Joseph Grundfest as saying that there “is no such thing” as a federal derivative action under Section 14(a). [read post]
17 Jun 2023, 4:30 pm
(Justice Barrett readily cited California v. [read post]
14 Jun 2023, 6:30 am
I first became aware of this in a brilliant essay by Stanford historian Jonathan Gnienapp that was published in a book that I edited on nullification and secession in contemporary constitutional theory. [read post]
9 Jun 2023, 3:30 am
Stated differently, these derivative suits concern internal corporate affairs—matters that are traditionally governed by state corporate law and, therefore, more sensibly litigated in the Delaware Chancery. [read post]
