Search for: "STANFORD v. STATE"
Results 61 - 80
of 2,149
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Oct 2023, 12:00 am
The DfE responded to the investigation by stating it would not be appropriate to comment on individual cases. [read post]
20 Oct 2023, 2:23 pm
[What Swift v. [read post]
11 Oct 2023, 9:25 am
”[12] Importantly, there is no presumption of cost reasonableness.[13] If an initial review of the facts results in the Government challenging a specific cost, the contractor has the burden to prove that the cost is reasonable.[14] The FAR provides that whether a cost is reasonable depends on a “variety of considerations and circumstances,” including the following: Whether it is the type of cost generally recognized as ordinary and necessary for the conduct of the… [read post]
10 Oct 2023, 4:44 pm
In Murray v. [read post]
9 Oct 2023, 11:19 am
Barton “Buzz” Thompson served as special master for the United States Supreme Court in Montana v. [read post]
9 Oct 2023, 1:52 am
The Court of Appeal had struck out parts of the claim in December on the grounds of the former King’s state immunity. [read post]
25 Sep 2023, 9:02 pm
Like in Bantam Books v. [read post]
14 Sep 2023, 1:57 pm
– 1:00 pm (Discussion) Boyd School of Law Room 203 In Person Registration is required Click Here To Register For the Student Only In Person Discussion In June, the Supreme Court issued its long-awaited decision in Brackeen v. [read post]
9 Sep 2023, 6:52 am
See Backpage.com v. [read post]
5 Sep 2023, 9:05 pm
Supreme Court next term of Securities and Exchange Commission v. [read post]
3 Sep 2023, 4:43 pm
On 4 August 2023, the Court of Appeal handed down judgment in National Council for Civil Liberties, R (On the Application Of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department & Anor [2023] EWCA Civ 926. [read post]
30 Aug 2023, 4:38 am
After all, in his dissent in Grutter v. [read post]
29 Aug 2023, 9:01 pm
In Regents of Univ. of California v. [read post]
25 Aug 2023, 5:30 am
Photo courtesy of Samantha Barbas.Actual Malice tells the full story of New York Times v. [read post]
22 Aug 2023, 6:06 am
Another conservative legal critic, Stanford’s Michael McConnell, suggested it is dangerous to exercise the law as laid out in the Constitution as perhaps all political protests could suffer. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 9:01 pm
Wade (1973) and Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
12 Aug 2023, 3:58 pm
Bas v. [read post]
10 Aug 2023, 9:57 am
Stanford, 148 Wis. 2d 158, 165, 434 N.W.2d 790, 793 (Ct. [read post]
8 Aug 2023, 4:05 pm
In difference-in-difference analyses, affected states experience increases in both capital and labor income relative to unaffected states. [read post]
24 Jul 2023, 12:00 pm
The Grasping Hand: Kelo v. [read post]
