Search for: "STANFORD v. STATE" Results 141 - 160 of 2,151
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Mar 2023, 8:50 am by Reference Staff
Martinez was part of the legal team that represented the petitioner in the landmark case Griggs v. [read post]
10 Mar 2023, 9:30 pm by ernst
   Ryan Reft, Library of Congress, has posted Gideon v. [read post]
A new book edited by Stanford Law School’s David Freeman Engstrom, the LSVF Professor in Law and co-director of the Deborah L. [read post]
23 Feb 2023, 9:39 am by Melissa De Witte
Evelyn Douek, Assistant Professor of Law(Originally published by Stanford News on October 7, 2022) On the docket for the United States Supreme Court this term is Gonzalez v. [read post]
12 Feb 2023, 8:09 am by Lawrence Solum
Here is an example from Judge Frank Easterbrook's opinion in United States v. [read post]
3 Feb 2023, 9:30 pm by Karen Tani
" Also, "A Brief Legislative History about Homebrewing in the United States": Part I and Part II.Constitutional Crisis Hotline, a podcast hosted by Jed Shugerman and Julie Suk (Fordham Law), has released an episode on "The 50th Anniversary of Roe v. [read post]
27 Jan 2023, 9:30 pm by ernst
United States, Sarah Friedman on  Hansberry v. [read post]
23 Jan 2023, 2:17 pm by Eugene Volokh
Articles about the First Amendment, state constitutional free speech provisions, federal and state statutes, common-law rules, and regulations protecting or restricting speech, or private organizations' speech regulations. [read post]
20 Jan 2023, 10:14 am by Sharon Driscoll
On January 22, 1973, the right to a legal abortion became a federal constitution right in the United States with the Supreme Court’s decision Roe v. [read post]
19 Jan 2023, 11:54 am by Eugene Volokh
Rosenblatt (Tulsa) Rebecca Tushnet (Harvard) John Villasenor (UCLA) Eugene Volokh (UCLA) The post Amicus Brief as to § 230(c)(1) in <i>Gonzalez v. [read post]
10 Jan 2023, 7:32 am by Derek T. Muller
Interestingly, there are not any California law schools on the list, a cohort I had assumed might benefit most from the state’s difficult bar examination and perhaps a higher “wait and see” approach from prospective employers.Now, to schools more likely to be adversely affected.SCHOOLS LIKELY TO BE ADVERSELY AFFECTEDAt grad v. 10 monthMassachusetts-Dartmouth 33.9%, 47.5%Yale 89.2%, 89.2%Stanford 88.5%, 89.0%BYU 82.8%, 85.9%Northwestern 87.9%, 89.5%CUNY… [read post]
10 Jan 2023, 7:32 am by Derek T. Muller
Interestingly, there are not any California law schools on the list, a cohort I had assumed might benefit most from the state’s difficult bar examination and perhaps a higher “wait and see” approach from prospective employers.Now, to schools more likely to be adversely affected.SCHOOLS LIKELY TO BE ADVERSELY AFFECTEDAt grad v. 10 monthMassachusetts-Dartmouth 33.9%, 47.5%Yale 89.2%, 89.2%Stanford 88.5%, 89.0%BYU 82.8%, 85.9%Northwestern 87.9%, 89.5%CUNY… [read post]