Search for: "STATE, EX REL. v. Miller" Results 1 - 20 of 159
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Jan 2025, 9:01 pm by renholding
  The amendment allows a company that receives an internal report to qualify for a presumption of a declination under the CEP for a self-disclosure that it makes after the whistleblower has already reported to the DOJ, as long as the company (a) self-discloses to the DOJ within 120 days of receiving the internal report (and before the DOJ reaches out to the company); and (b) meets the other requirements for voluntary self-disclosure and presumption of a declination under the CEP.[15] In… [read post]
16 Dec 2024, 9:16 am by Arthur F. Coon and Matthew C. Henderson
On November 22, 2024, the First District Court of Appeal’s (Div. 4) partially-published opinion in People of the State of California ex rel. [read post]
4 Jan 2024, 12:50 pm by Josh Blackman
Heilpern and Worlsey continue by suggesting that we have "rel[ied]" on the "support" argument. [read post]
13 Sep 2023, 5:38 am by Stephen E. Sachs
This binding "procedural instruction" is relatively well known in the ERA debate; the Trump Administration's Office of Legal Counsel cited it in a 2020 opinion rejecting the ERA. [read post]
13 Jun 2023, 5:50 am by Eugene Volokh
Otto that it was not misconduct connected with the employee's work to violate a company rule forbidding all contact between current employees and ex-employees. [read post]