Search for: "STATE, EX REL. v. Miller"
Results 1 - 20
of 159
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jan 2025, 6:00 am
at 128, citing Fetahu v New Jersey Tr. [read post]
29 Jan 2025, 6:00 am
at 128, citing Fetahu v New Jersey Tr. [read post]
20 Jan 2025, 9:01 pm
The amendment allows a company that receives an internal report to qualify for a presumption of a declination under the CEP for a self-disclosure that it makes after the whistleblower has already reported to the DOJ, as long as the company (a) self-discloses to the DOJ within 120 days of receiving the internal report (and before the DOJ reaches out to the company); and (b) meets the other requirements for voluntary self-disclosure and presumption of a declination under the CEP.[15] In… [read post]
16 Dec 2024, 9:16 am
On November 22, 2024, the First District Court of Appeal’s (Div. 4) partially-published opinion in People of the State of California ex rel. [read post]
28 Oct 2024, 5:09 pm
”) This would seem to overturn United States ex rel. [read post]
20 Jun 2024, 1:29 pm
In United States v. [read post]
20 May 2024, 4:25 pm
”) United States ex rel. [read post]
9 May 2024, 7:00 am
Bd., 64 F3d 184, 188 [5th Cir 1995], citing Tinker v Des Moines Indep. [read post]
9 May 2024, 7:00 am
Bd., 64 F3d 184, 188 [5th Cir 1995], citing Tinker v Des Moines Indep. [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 7:03 am
Other states have similar, recent decisions [see Western Millwork v. [read post]
25 Jan 2024, 2:51 pm
In County of Sacramento v. [read post]
4 Jan 2024, 12:50 pm
Heilpern and Worlsey continue by suggesting that we have "rel[ied]" on the "support" argument. [read post]
29 Dec 2023, 2:52 pm
See, e.g., Garrard ex rel. [read post]
13 Sep 2023, 5:38 am
This binding "procedural instruction" is relatively well known in the ERA debate; the Trump Administration's Office of Legal Counsel cited it in a 2020 opinion rejecting the ERA. [read post]
29 Aug 2023, 10:05 am
Christopher Anderson, et al. v. [read post]
7 Aug 2023, 11:22 am
State ex rel. 14th Dist. [read post]
1 Aug 2023, 7:00 am
In U.S. ex rel IGW Electric LLC v. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 7:49 am
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES Syllabus STUDENTS FOR FAIR ADMISSIONS, INC. v. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 7:49 am
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES Syllabus STUDENTS FOR FAIR ADMISSIONS, INC. v. [read post]
13 Jun 2023, 5:50 am
Otto that it was not misconduct connected with the employee's work to violate a company rule forbidding all contact between current employees and ex-employees. [read post]