Search for: "STATE, EX REL. v. Miller" Results 81 - 100 of 171
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Mar 2016, 6:46 am by Kate Fort
App. 1998); In re Marcus S., 638 A.2d 1158, 1159 (Maine 1994); State ex rel. [read post]
24 Jun 2021, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
First, there is a lot of new material regarding the “loyal denominator” issue (see here and here): whether the former Confederate states were to be included in the Article V total of states of which three fourths were required to ratify an amendment, or whether (as I think) only three fourths of the states represented in Congress were required, because rebel states’ Article V naysaying power, like their Article I right to be… [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 9:57 pm by Francis G.X. Pileggi
To see why that matters, let’s go back to my Indeterminacy article, linked above (footnotes omitted): In Miller v. [read post]
15 Jul 2018, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
’” (I have written in academic scholarship that the Hawke Court reached the right result because Ohio’s ratification was already communicated to DC and could not be undone, but not because the word “legislature” should be read to forbid the use of the referendum device.)In two other important cases from the first half of the twentieth century, Ohio ex. rel. [read post]
25 Jul 2007, 10:37 am
The law lists 11 types of household relationships besides spouse, including other relatives, in-laws and ex-spouses. [read post]
27 May 2016, 8:00 am by John Elwood
United States ex rel Rigsby, 15-513, has its origins in Hurricane Katrina. [read post]
7 Jul 2015, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
’” But in rejecting the argument based on Hawke and its reading of Article V, the majority opinion in AIRC instead relied on two other cases, Ohio ex. rel. [read post]