Search for: "STATE, EX REL. v. Miller" Results 121 - 140 of 172
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Oct 2015, 7:08 am by John Elwood
Louisiana, 14-280 – in which the Court is considering whether Miller v. [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 9:30 pm by ernst
  Almost all states had some kind of blue-sky law by 1931. [read post]
13 Sep 2023, 5:38 am by Stephen E. Sachs
This binding "procedural instruction" is relatively well known in the ERA debate; the Trump Administration's Office of Legal Counsel cited it in a 2020 opinion rejecting the ERA. [read post]
7 Jun 2013, 1:26 pm by Schachtman
The 5 supposedly represented the relative risk of asbestos exposure alone in insulators who did not smoke; the 10 supposedly represented the relative risk of smoking alone in the non-insulator general population of smokers; and the 50 represented the relative risk of insulators who had smoked. [read post]
4 Jan 2024, 12:50 pm by Josh Blackman
Heilpern and Worlsey continue by suggesting that we have "rel[ied]" on the "support" argument. [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
Note, however, that this figure does not include class action suits filed in state court or state court derivative suits, including those in the Delaware Court of Chancery. [read post]
7 Apr 2014, 5:18 pm by Arthur F. Coon
State of California ex rel 14th District Agricultural Association (3d Dist. 3/26/14) ___ Cal.App.4th ____, ___Cal.Rptr.3d ____, 2014 WL 1232608. [read post]