Search for: "STATE, EX REL. v. Unified School District"
Results 1 - 20
of 30
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Feb 2013, 5:00 am
In San Francisco Unified School District ex. rel. [read post]
2 Nov 2006, 4:38 am
Per Park, ex rel. [read post]
2 Sep 2013, 4:05 am
Capistrano Unified School District, 5 Regent Journal of Law & Public Policy 85-109 (2013).James A. [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 12:16 am
State ex rel. [read post]
28 Jan 2015, 1:15 pm
No. 204, 636 F.3d 874 (7th Cir. 2011); Holloman ex rel. [read post]
16 Jan 2009, 11:08 am
The case is Safford Unified School District v. [read post]
29 Apr 2014, 11:57 am
District and J.S. ex rel. [read post]
7 Oct 2009, 1:44 am
The Supremes let the Ninth Circuit decision stand.The other case was Stancourt ex rel Stancourt v. [read post]
22 Feb 2016, 8:00 am
Courts Hold Implied Certification Theory Valid Under California False Claims Act In San Francisco Unified School Dist. ex rel. [read post]
14 Aug 2011, 8:43 am
The Ohio Supreme Court also held that e-mails were not a public record in The State Ex Rel. [read post]
23 Sep 2009, 10:48 am
” See Smith ex rel. [read post]
24 Dec 2013, 8:30 am
Poway Unified School District, in which another panel of the Ninth Circuit decided that a high school math teacher’s posting of religious banners in his classroom was essentially “government speech. [read post]
18 May 2011, 3:00 am
To the contrary, teachers and school districts are not expected to be insurers of the safety of students. [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 3:00 am
To the contrary, teachers and school districts are not expected to be insurers of the safety of students. [read post]
1 Apr 2021, 8:33 am
Dist. v. [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 8:52 am
Resources Code, § 21050 et seq.) to a state agency’s proprietary acts with respect to a state-owned and funded rail line or is CEQA not preempted in such circumstances under the market participant doctrine (see Town of Atherton v. [read post]
27 Aug 2014, 1:35 pm
In Bowen v. [read post]
26 Jun 2011, 5:45 pm
Las Virgenes Unified School District, 494 F.3d 1162 (9th Cir. 2007). [read post]
13 Oct 2015, 9:48 am
State ex rel. 14th Dist. [read post]
28 Apr 2021, 2:41 pm
No. 204 (7th Cir. 2011) (looking to the reactions of onlookers to determine whether the speech could be regulated); Holloman ex rel. [read post]
