Search for: "STATE, EX REL. v. Unified School District" Results 1 - 20 of 30
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Sep 2013, 4:05 am by Howard Friedman
Capistrano Unified School District, 5 Regent Journal of Law & Public Policy 85-109 (2013).James A. [read post]
16 Jan 2009, 11:08 am
  The case is Safford Unified School District v. [read post]
7 Oct 2009, 1:44 am
The Supremes let the Ninth Circuit decision stand.The other case was Stancourt ex rel Stancourt v. [read post]
22 Feb 2016, 8:00 am by Gregory J. Brod
Courts Hold Implied Certification Theory Valid Under California False Claims Act In San Francisco Unified School Dist. ex rel. [read post]
24 Dec 2013, 8:30 am by David Urban
Poway Unified School District, in which another panel of the Ninth Circuit decided that a high school math teacher’s posting of religious banners in his classroom was essentially “government speech. [read post]
9 May 2024, 7:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
 A school district’s discretion to remove material from its collection, however, must be exercised within “fundamental constitutional safeguards” (Campbell v St. [read post]
9 May 2024, 7:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
 A school district’s discretion to remove material from its collection, however, must be exercised within “fundamental constitutional safeguards” (Campbell v St. [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 3:00 am by John Day
 To the contrary, teachers and school districts are not expected to be insurers of the safety of students. [read post]
18 May 2011, 3:00 am by John Day
 To the contrary, teachers and school districts are not expected to be insurers of the safety of students. [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 8:52 am by Abbott & Kindermann
Resources Code, § 21050 et seq.) to a state agency’s proprietary acts with respect to a state-owned and funded rail line or is CEQA not preempted in such circumstances under the market participant doctrine (see Town of Atherton v. [read post]
26 Jun 2011, 5:45 pm by Tyler S St Cyr
Las Virgenes Unified School District, 494 F.3d 1162 (9th Cir. 2007). [read post]