Search for: "STATE OF ARKANSAS v. STATE OF TENNESSEE."
Results 101 - 120
of 285
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jan 2023, 8:22 am
NYU (3 v. 7) and Georgetown (11 v. 14) are harmed the most.Now, the degree to which this benefits or harms a school entirely depends, of course, on how much USNWR chooses to reduce the weight of the category.For schools presently outside the “top 50,” schools that stand to gain the most include Wayne State, Baylor, Penn State-Dickinson, Tennessee, and Penn State-University Park. [read post]
10 Dec 2018, 12:51 pm
Stitt and U.S. v. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 1:04 pm
Virginia State v. [read post]
3 Sep 2024, 5:51 am
[i] Alabama, Arkansas, Idaho, Indiana, Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri, North Dakota, Oklahoma, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, West Virginia, American Samoa, Northern Marianas. [read post]
22 Jul 2013, 8:05 am
Considered a "landmark case", Epperson v. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 4:49 pm
In State v. [read post]
20 Nov 2022, 9:55 am
In Tennessee, Aymette v. [read post]
14 Mar 2019, 7:30 pm
Mississippi is on the verge of passing a six-week abortion ban, and several other states are considering doing so, including Ohio, Tennessee, Missouri, Georgia, Texas, and Florida. [read post]
[David Kopel] Restoring the right to bear arms, New York State Rifle and Pistol Association v. Bruen
9 Aug 2022, 9:19 am
States v. [read post]
4 Mar 2023, 4:13 am
” The 13 states expressly named are: Alabama, Arkansas, Idaho, Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri, Oklahoma, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, West Virginia, Wisconsin, and Oklahoma. [read post]
2 Feb 2011, 1:52 pm
The civil lawsuit, Beaty, et al. v. [read post]
12 Sep 2013, 7:19 pm
The petition of the day is: Plumhoff v. [read post]
17 Sep 2009, 10:01 pm
There are many state specific blogs related to family law topics, representing 38 states (and several foreign countries). [read post]
16 Nov 2007, 1:08 am
[www.oranous.com][www.oranous.com] No. 07-5439 IN THE Supreme Court of the United States RALPH BAZE, ET AL., Petitioners, v. [read post]
15 Apr 2009, 4:44 am
" Id. at 33.ArkansasOur research indicates that no Arkansas court has ever decided one way or the other whether medical monitoring can be sought as a separate cause of action by someone with no other injury.CaliforniaThe California Supreme Court has recognizes medical monitoring as a remedy "when liability is established under traditional tort theories of recovery. [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 5:19 pm
See United States v. [read post]
6 Mar 2014, 12:41 pm
Some states qualify their safe harbors with modifying adverbs, such as "specifically," "expressly," or "affirmatively" (Florida, Georgia, Idaho, Illinois, Indiana, Michigan, New Mexico, Ohio, Tennessee, Utah). [read post]
15 Feb 2018, 11:59 am
” Huebner writes that Fortas concluded his opinion “by citing not the words of the Arkansas statute, but the Tennessee statute under which Scopes had been convicted” in the famous Scopes Trial. [read post]
24 Jul 2018, 5:12 am
Complete Auto Remains the Rule, As Modified by Wayfair The South Dakota v. [read post]
21 Sep 2012, 7:14 am
” The court also refused to dismiss claims under antitrust and consumer protection laws in eight states: Arkansas, Florida, Minnesota, New Mexico, Tennessee, California, Massachusetts and Vermont. [read post]
