Search for: "STATE OF MARYLAND v. STATE OF LOUISIANA" Results 81 - 100 of 426
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jun 2017, 10:32 am by Francisco Macías
  The fraud aspect of the case was drawn from testimony by a “man who [. . .] stated that she was Louisiana Creole. [read post]
23 May 2014, 11:44 am by John Elwood
  Comptroller of the Treasury of Maryland v. [read post]
15 Dec 2017, 4:02 am by Edith Roberts
Louisiana, a capital case scheduled for oral argument in January. [read post]
24 Nov 2020, 2:55 am by Kevin Kaufman
Key Findings: Excessive tax rates on cigarettes in some states induce substantial black and gray market movement of tobacco products into high-tax states from low-tax states or foreign sources. [read post]
10 Apr 2018, 3:53 am by Edith Roberts
At SSRN, Bryan Lammon explains why United States v. [read post]
30 Nov 2010, 12:00 am by Jeff Gamso
Three and a half months later, at the end of March, the Court heard oral argument in cases from five states (Texas, Florida, Georgia, North Carolina, and Louisiana) that had enacted new death penalty laws after the Court's 1972 decision in Furman v. [read post]
16 Nov 2015, 3:25 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
The other states are Alabama, Alaska, Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, Idaho, Indiana, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Michigan, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, North Carolina, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, South Dakota, Tennessee, Virginia, West Virginia and Wyoming. [read post]
6 Aug 2019, 5:45 am by Kevin Kaufman
For instance, Maryland permits local governments to provide a credit for expanding manufacturing facilities.[6] Similarly, Idaho allows counties to exempt TPP that is part of an investment of at least $500,000 in a new manufacturing plant for up to five years.[7] Seven states (Delaware, Hawaii,  Illinois, Iowa, New York, Ohio, and Pennsylvania)  exempt all TPP from taxation, while another five states (Minnesota, New Hampshire, New Jersey, North Dakota,  and… [read post]
5 Dec 2014, 9:30 pm by Dan Ernst
We focus first on the landmark 1813 case Queen v. [read post]