Search for: "STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. MARK JACKSON," Results 1 - 20 of 49
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 May 2021, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
Both the Department of Justice and the state of New Jersey have previously sued the township over its targeting of Orthodox Jews. [read post]
22 May 2021, 12:04 pm by admin
Considering the Daubert factors, and New Jersey precedent, the Appellate Division readily found that Webber’s opinion was inadmissible. [read post]
15 Jan 2020, 4:11 am by Edith Roberts
United States, which stems from the “Bridgegate” controversy in New Jersey and involves the extent to which federal fraud statutes cover the politically motivated acts of public officials, for this blog, in a post that first appeared at Howe on the Court. [read post]
29 Sep 2023, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
Yahoo News – Ken Dilanian and Frank Thorp V (NBC News) | Published: 9/27/2023 U.S. [read post]
1 Feb 2021, 4:00 am by Andrew Appel
And other states and counties that are considering BMDs-for-all-voters—some counties in Pennsylvania and New Jersey have bought those, New York is considering them—should consider the nightmare scenario, and stick with hand-marked paper ballots. [read post]
5 Aug 2009, 5:21 pm
Jackson, overruling it's 1990 decision, State ex rel. [read post]
7 Apr 2019, 4:03 pm by INFORRM
NJ.com reports that Dr James Goydos, a former professor of surgery for Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, faces a 160-count indictment accusing him of photographing women in a bathroom, burglary and identity theft. [read post]
12 May 2015, 10:58 am
The New Jersey Supreme Court decision last year in State v. [read post]
18 May 2009, 5:24 am
’ (China Law Blog)   Europe ECJ finds similar marks on wine and glasses not likely to cause confusion: Waterford Wedgewood plc v Assembled Investments (Proprietary) Ltd, OHIM (Class 46) (IPKat) AG Colomer opines in Maple leaf trade mark battle: joined cases American Clothing Associates SA v OHIM and OHIM v American Clothing Associates SA (IPKat) (Excess Copyright) CFI: Restitutio and time limits: how does the law stand now for CTMs? [read post]
28 Oct 2018, 5:09 pm by INFORRM
In concluding affirmatively, the article focuses on the case of Pitman v Jersey Evening Post [2012] JRC 92. [read post]
27 Feb 2009, 7:00 am
(Techdirt) How companies can cash in on innovations and patents (IP Frontline) International Property Rights Index 2009 - New report identifies world’s most IP-friendly country, but trade marks are ignored (IAM) What do clients want? [read post]