Search for: "STATE OF NEW YORK v. STATE OF CONNECTICUT" Results 1 - 20 of 1,315
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Aug 2007, 11:48 pm
On October 3rd of this year, the Supreme Court will entertain arguments is New York State Board of Elections v. [read post]
10 Apr 2008, 6:02 am
According to the Courant, New York Secretary of State Lorraine Cortés-Vázquez notified her counterpart in Connecticut, Susan Bysiewicz, of the decision at 8:30 pm yesterday. [read post]
20 Apr 2011, 12:12 am by Richard Frank
Actually, it’s not that difficult a prognostication: the plaintiff states, City of New York and private land trusts are going to lose. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 7:54 am
The Connecticut decision had given standing to several U.S. states, the city of New York and private land trusts to sue AEP for nuissance arising from the production of greenhouse gases. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 9:16 am
Two days ago I posted information on this blog related to the New York Court of Appeals decision (Maron v. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 7:54 am
The Connecticut decision had given standing to several U.S. states, the city of New York and private land trusts to sue AEP for nuissance arising from the production of greenhouse gases. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 1:26 pm
“Marriage Equality,” as the New York statute is entitled, has been a hard fought battle.New York’s highest court held that there was no state constitutional right to same-sex marriage in Hernandez v. [read post]
17 Sep 2010, 3:56 pm by Norm Pattis
 My hope was to poke my head in on the trial of State v. [read post]
18 Apr 2011, 8:28 pm by Richard Frank
Representing the states, New York City and the land trusts at tomorrow’s arguments will be New York state Solicitor General Barbara Underwood, a veteran Supreme Court advocate who served as a high-ranking official within USDOJ’s Solicitor General’s Office during the Clinton Administration. [read post]
20 Oct 2007, 2:36 am
Via the New York Times: Catherine Roraback, a lawyer who pressed the Connecticut case that eventually led the United States Supreme Court to rule that laws banning the use of contraceptives were unconstitutional, a precursor to its Roe v. [read post]
18 Feb 2008, 7:17 am
In this day and age in which parties obtain an order regarding child support in one state and then move to another jurisdiction, it is important to know that the original support order cannot be modified or even extended by a court in the second state, so said the New York Court of Appeals in the case Spencer v. [read post]
19 Aug 2014, 6:19 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
In short, our error in interpreting New York law was one we were unable to remedy. [read post]