Search for: "STATE OF OKLAHOMA v. STATE OF TEXAS"
Results 21 - 40
of 937
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Nov 2015, 10:57 am
The Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals recently confirmed in Cardoni, et al. v. [read post]
11 Jul 2020, 7:35 am
, United States v. [read post]
1 Feb 2019, 9:43 am
The Texas Court of Criminal Appeals recently went to great lengths to explain a decision that came to a different result than the Supreme Court in Carpenter v. [read post]
8 Dec 2008, 1:47 am
A playoff is the only way to really crown a champion. 8 teams - Florida, Oklahoma, Texas, USC, Penn State, Virginia Tech, Cincinnati and Utah. [read post]
1 May 2022, 3:45 pm
State of Oklahoma, (OK Sup. [read post]
6 Mar 2022, 9:00 pm
Rees decision and approved the use of midazolam in 2015 in Glossip v. [read post]
19 Apr 2013, 1:57 pm
On Tuesday in Tarrant Regional Water District v. [read post]
11 Mar 2009, 6:24 am
SENTENCINGUnited States v. [read post]
30 Nov 2012, 2:24 pm
US Supreme Court Scolds Oklahoma Supremes for Discounting Arbitration Precedent, ABA Journal, November 26, 2012 Nitro-Lift Technologies v. [read post]
12 Sep 2018, 9:14 pm
(Missouri, Alabama, Arkansas, Indiana, Iowa, Louisiana, Nebraska, Nevada, North Dakota, Oklahoma, Texas, Utah, and Wisconsin). [read post]
16 May 2013, 3:02 am
Caldera v. [read post]
16 Sep 2013, 7:18 am
In one sense, Cline v. [read post]
11 Apr 2020, 9:26 am
Following Texas and Ohio’s leads, several states (Alabama, Iowa, Oklahoma, and Mississippi) have used these directives to stop surgical and even medical abortions under the pretense that abortion constitutes a nonessential procedure. [read post]
14 Jun 2013, 1:43 pm
The upstream States (Texas, Oklahoma, and Arkansas), which control the River's flow, were unwilling to release water stored within their own reservoirs for the benefit of any downstream States, like Louisiana. [read post]
14 Jun 2013, 1:43 pm
The upstream States (Texas, Oklahoma, and Arkansas), which control the River's flow, were unwilling to release water stored within their own reservoirs for the benefit of any downstream States, like Louisiana. [read post]
14 Jun 2013, 1:43 pm
The upstream States (Texas, Oklahoma, and Arkansas), which control the River's flow, were unwilling to release water stored within their own reservoirs for the benefit of any downstream States, like Louisiana. [read post]
3 Nov 2015, 8:37 am
Both state court cases were removed to federal court and consolidated in Texas. [read post]
30 Dec 2014, 9:01 pm
Nebraska and Oklahoma v. [read post]
16 Jan 2014, 1:36 pm
Evans to United State v. [read post]
18 Jul 2016, 9:46 am
The case is State of Texas, et al. v. [read post]
