Search for: "STATE PERSONNEL DEPT. v. Mays" Results 1 - 20 of 165
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Apr 2022, 5:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
" Such actions may constitute adverse personnel action within the meaning of §75-b in the same way that the State Human Rights Law has been found to cover certain violations of the State Human Rights Law, citing Beckett v Prudential Ins. [read post]
1 Apr 2022, 5:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
" Such actions may constitute adverse personnel action within the meaning of §75-b in the same way that the State Human Rights Law has been found to cover certain violations of the State Human Rights Law, citing Beckett v Prudential Ins. [read post]
3 Feb 2023, 9:30 pm by Public Employment Law Press
[by] name or other reasonable technological effort" (Matter of Pflaum v Grattan, 116 AD3d 1103, 1104 [3d Dept 2014]; see Matter of Reclaim the Records v New York State Dept. of Health, 185 AD3d 1268, 1269 [3d Dept 2020], lv denied 36 NY3d 910 [2021]). [read post]
3 Feb 2023, 9:30 pm by Public Employment Law Press
[by] name or other reasonable technological effort" (Matter of Pflaum v Grattan, 116 AD3d 1103, 1104 [3d Dept 2014]; see Matter of Reclaim the Records v New York State Dept. of Health, 185 AD3d 1268, 1269 [3d Dept 2020], lv denied 36 NY3d 910 [2021]). [read post]
17 Dec 2018, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Liberties Union v New York City Police Dept., 2018 NY Slip Op 08423, Court of AppealsNew York State's Civil Rights Law §50-a requires that police officer personnel records be kept confidential and sets out a procedure to obtain a court order of disclosure of such records. [read post]
17 Dec 2018, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Liberties Union v New York City Police Dept., 2018 NY Slip Op 08423, Court of AppealsNew York State's Civil Rights Law §50-a requires that police officer personnel records be kept confidential and sets out a procedure to obtain a court order of disclosure of such records. [read post]
28 Jun 2016, 4:30 am by The Public Employment Law Press
”* In Kowaleski v New York State Dept. of Correctional Servs., 16 NY3d 85, the Court of Appeals held that an arbitrator’s refusal to hear an employee’s “whistle blower” defense in the course of disciplinary hearing required the vacating of the award.The decision is posted on the Internet at:http://www.nycourts.gov/reporter/3dseries/2016/2016_04807.htm [read post]
21 Sep 2011, 4:28 am
An entity not a party to a collective bargaining agreement negotiated pursuant to the Taylor Law may not be bound by its termsMatter of Council of School Supervisors & Adm'rs, Local 1 v New York City Dept. of Educ., 2011 NY Slip Op 06451, Appellate Division, First Department The Council filed a contract grievance in response to a city-wide plan applicable to all city agencies that reduced the number of parking permits issued to municipal workers for parking on… [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 4:01 am
Simple majority vote required for most personnel actions taken by a Board Inquiry from a NYPPL reader From time to time a reader will submit a question concerning a personnel matter that may be of general interest to the readers of New York Public Personnel Law. [read post]
14 Oct 2008, 11:05 am
Broich, President, Fortress Security From time to time a reader will submit a question concerning a personnel matter that may be of general interest to the readers of New York Public Personnel Law. [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 12:35 pm
Employer's liability for employee’s off-duty conduct Perez v City of New York, App. [read post]
12 Jun 2008, 12:04 am
Sometimes the individual may request that his or her entire personnel record be considered in order to mitigate the penalty to be imposed. [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 1:48 pm by Kevin Sheerin
 The always informative NY Public Personnel law blog on a recent whistleblower case: Arbitrator’s refusal to hear employee’s “whistle blower” defense in the course of disciplinary hearing requires the vacating of the award   Arbitrator’s refusal to hear employee’s “whistle blower” defense in the course of disciplinary hearing requires the vacating of the award Matter of Kowaleski v New York State Dept.… [read post]