Search for: "STATE ex rel. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS v. POWERS"
Results 1 - 20
of 116
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Mar 2008, 1:25 pm
To download a copy of the Appellate Division’s decision, please use this link: People ex rel Sidney Burch v. [read post]
6 Sep 2017, 11:27 am
State ex rel. [read post]
2 Jul 2019, 9:34 am
Because the state tax authority issued an assessment based on its examination of the taxpayer’s books and records, an assessment is afforded a presumption of correctness.7 This presumption of correctness means that the department of revenue satisfied its prima facie requirement to establish the basis for an assessment. [read post]
21 Sep 2017, 9:38 am
State ex rel. [read post]
3 Jul 2018, 5:02 am
” They are correct. [read post]
27 Sep 2022, 12:18 pm
United States ex rel. [read post]
21 Jun 2023, 1:15 pm
T., a Child (Indian Child Welfare Act) State ex rel. [read post]
13 Sep 2007, 12:58 am
United States, and FCA is ex rel. [read post]
23 May 2011, 8:44 am
The meaning of “miscarriage of justice” in s. 133 was previously considered by the House of Lords in R (Mullen) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2004] UKHL 18; [2005] 1 AC 1. [read post]
6 Mar 2020, 9:40 am
In a 1918 case, State ex rel. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 12:47 pm
Concluding that it4 TRUMP v. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 4:48 pm
Arizona ex rel. [read post]
20 Aug 2007, 3:50 am
Secretary, Department of Corrections ¸ (CaseNo. 8:06-cv-01330-T-17MAP decided August 7, 2007). [read post]
23 Aug 2019, 6:25 am
State ex rel Carver v. [read post]
15 Nov 2018, 10:30 pm
"The decision is set out below:The People of the State of New York, ex rel. [read post]
24 Feb 2015, 7:12 am
United States ex rel. [read post]
7 Oct 2013, 8:07 pm
Initiative use ex-ploded in the following decades, reaching a peak of 377 in the 1990s, 177 of which were approved. [read post]
22 Feb 2018, 6:00 am
As I noted on Lawfare, the court ignored the most relevant precedent, United States ex rel. [read post]
4 Mar 2007, 5:10 am
State v. [read post]
9 Nov 2014, 6:46 pm
Ex parte United States, 242 U.S. 27, 37 S.Ct. 72, 61 L.Ed. 129 (1916). [read post]
