Search for: "STATE ex rel. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS v. POWERS"
Results 61 - 80
of 116
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Aug 2011, 10:27 am
In particular, because of the Supreme Court’s recent opinion in AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
25 Jul 2020, 12:21 am
To depart from this default rule, the state needs to provide a sufficient justification. [read post]
9 May 2010, 9:14 pm
United States v. [read post]
22 May 2014, 5:00 am
Generally, government employees are immune from discovery in private litigation under rules first set out in United States ex rel. [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 11:17 am
United States v. [read post]
7 May 2010, 10:00 pm
Paul, Rust v. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 2:00 pm
United States v. [read post]
13 Jul 2018, 7:00 am
United States (argued and briefed as Dalmazzi v. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 1:30 pm
NRG Power Mkt’g v. [read post]
10 May 2018, 4:12 am
The union is the only permenancy of the department. [read post]
31 Aug 2016, 11:19 am
Example: The mailman delivering mail to John and Sally’s mailbox trips and injures himself on an extension cord the Johnsons’ were using to power their Christmas lights. [read post]
21 Dec 2020, 5:01 am
It was not until 1961, in Monroe v. [read post]
31 Jul 2019, 7:46 am
Was there an independent cause of action–separate from the allegation of ultra vires governmental action–in cases like Ex Parte Young (1908), Larson v. [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 8:52 am
California Department of Fish and Wildlife. [read post]
8 Mar 2022, 5:00 am
Supreme Court’s statement in Reiter v. [read post]
8 Jan 2023, 6:30 am
We know that the original electorate was remarkably restricted at the time, even if it would become more inclusive relatively early in the 19th century. [read post]
24 Sep 2011, 3:58 am
http://j.st/c4h Kolev v. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 3:02 pm
Hounslow v Powell; Leeds v Hall; Birmingham v Frisby [2011] UKSC 8 [This is probably a work in progress. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 3:02 pm
Hounslow v Powell; Leeds v Hall; Birmingham v Frisby [2011] UKSC 8 [This is probably a work in progress. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 12:35 pm
Upton); ex post facto clause challenges ( Trotter v. [read post]
