Search for: "STATE ex rel. SHORT v. STATE BD. OF EQUALIZATION"
Results 1 - 13
of 13
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Aug 2016, 11:22 am
In fact, she claims the court has found the clauses to be equivalent since 1895, citing State ex rel. [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 7:27 pm
Evans,[1] 517 U.S. 620 (1996) (equal protection limitations)· City of EastLake v. [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 8:03 am
State Land Bd. v. [read post]
25 Oct 2022, 10:46 am
Public Company Accounting Oversight Bd., 561 U.S. 477, 505 (2010)). [read post]
15 Jan 2019, 6:51 pm
A short news report of the case and issues follows (Judge rejects citizenship question for 2020 U.S. census) along with a small portion of the opinion. [read post]
13 Feb 2017, 1:18 pm
The court implied in dicta that the order may also violate the Establishment Clause, but stopped short of so holding. [read post]
26 Apr 2019, 9:53 am
Those hours multiplied by his standard hourly rate equals between $322,500 and $400,000, so he testified that a reasonable and necessary fee would be between $300,000 and $400,000. [read post]
14 Mar 2017, 11:54 am
In Zamora v. [read post]
29 Sep 2023, 1:59 am
See L.W. ex rel. [read post]
23 Sep 2021, 1:09 pm
City of Richmond, 226 U.S. 137, 143–44 (1912); see also Washington ex rel. [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 12:13 pm
University of Texas at Austin, 14-981, involves an Equal Protection Clause challenge to UT’s use of race in undergraduate admissions. [read post]
18 May 2019, 9:27 am
Those hours multiplied by his standard hourly rate equals between $322,500 and $400,000, so he testified that a reasonable and necessary fee would be between $300,000 and $400,000. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 10:32 am
Weiler (2009) for their help in preparing this short paper and their future assistance on what will be a much more in depth study of these issues. 1 states. [read post]
