Search for: "STATE v SHOOK" Results 121 - 140 of 277
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Jan 2010, 6:57 am
In addition, both parties’ representatives shook hands after reaching the original deal, stating something to the effect of “we have a deal. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 6:43 am by Schachtman
Sellers, quoted Mark Behrens, of Shook, Hardy & Bacon, as stating that: “This case is part of an emerging national attack on state workers’ compensation systems by the personal injury bar. [read post]
21 Nov 2012, 11:30 am by William A. Ruskin
To illustrate their point, the SH&B lawyers discuss the Third Circuit’s opinion in Greenspan v. [read post]
12 Jun 2012, 5:30 pm by Colin O'Keefe
– Legal marketing expert Paula Black on her In Black and White blog FunnyJunk v. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 11:55 am
June. 13, 2013), holding essentially that, since those meanies on the United States Supreme Court aren’t letting plaintiffs sue generic manufacturers, we’ll change Alabama common law and let them sue someone else. [read post]
23 Jan 2015, 9:30 am
  As stated in Moore’s Federal Practice, “The identity of class members must be ascertainable by reference to objective criteria. [read post]
14 Dec 2014, 7:47 pm by Dennis Crouch
Bart Eppenauer is the Managing Partner of the Seattle office of Shook Hardy & Bacon. [read post]
1 Nov 2011, 9:12 am by Peter Huang
As As Levine, Safer, and Lench nicely state it, "[i]n the same way, updating a map when new roads are built makes it more accurate. [read post]
25 Nov 2019, 12:48 pm by Tom Zagorsky
Supreme Court decided to hear an appeal of a Ninth Circuit case, SEC v. [read post]