Search for: "STATE v. CARRASCO"
Results 1 - 20
of 23
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jun 2012, 6:28 am
In Carrasco v. [read post]
2 Aug 2007, 5:06 am
SENTENCINGUnited States v. [read post]
5 Jan 2020, 4:00 am
Descarga el documento: United States v. [read post]
4 Oct 2019, 2:35 pm
The Carrascos then sued the firm in California state court, alleging legal malpractice. [read post]
15 Sep 2011, 4:41 am
United States v. [read post]
6 Dec 2015, 3:05 pm
” Tone-Loc, Funky Cold Medina.United States v. [read post]
1 Sep 2008, 1:53 pm
State v. [read post]
10 Jun 2008, 2:30 am
The California Court of Appeals opinion in People v. [read post]
17 Jun 2010, 4:12 am
United States v. [read post]
17 Jun 2010, 3:48 am
Carrasco v. [read post]
12 Nov 2011, 9:20 pm
State v. [read post]
27 Nov 2017, 4:00 am
Implications for Public Administration from Trinity Lutheran v. [read post]
5 Aug 2014, 1:40 pm
Supreme Court ruling in Miller v. [read post]
26 Feb 2009, 7:36 am
State v. [read post]
1 Sep 2009, 4:39 am
"The Second Department of the Appellate Division recently stated in Kluczka v Lecci (63 AD3d 796 [2009]) that: "[i]n order to prevail in an action to recover damages for legal malpractice, a plaintiff must establish that the defendant attorney failed to exercise the ordinary reasonable skill and knowledge commonly possessed by a member of the legal profession, and that the breach of this duty proximately caused the plaintiff to sustain actual and ascertainable… [read post]
26 Nov 2010, 12:30 pm
Gonzales, Carrasco, and another bank employee, Brittany Rogers, testified that Rasmussen raised his crutch as if he were going to use it to strike Gonzales and Carrasco. [read post]
27 Oct 2009, 2:32 pm
Two more summary orders of interest:In United States v. [read post]
3 Dec 2015, 7:47 am
United States v. [read post]
18 May 2017, 6:53 am
” United States v. [read post]
2 Sep 2008, 5:17 pm
Carrasco, No. 061887, 061888 Convictions for possession of cocaine and heroin are vacated and remanded where: 1) the district court plainly misremembered its own ruling and the state of the docket; 2) admission of one defendant's confession to impeach him may have made the difference between his conviction and his acquittal; and 3) district court's reversal of its own ruling, with no consideration for the reliance of the parties and after other defendant had already… [read post]
