Search for: "STATE v. CLEMENTS"
Results 1 - 20
of 808
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Nov 2017, 6:55 am
Criminal procedure — Motion to suppress evidence — Voicemail on cellphone On April 14, 2014, appellant, Clement Reynolds, was arrested at John F. [read post]
26 Jul 2019, 7:02 am
Criminal procedure — Jury instruction — Flight On October 27, 2017, a jury sitting in the Circuit Court for Anne Arundel County convicted appellant, Michael Clement Sampson, of attempted rape in the second degree, attempted sex offense in the fourth degree, three counts of assault in the second degree, and false imprisonment. [read post]
27 Sep 2009, 6:10 pm
Is Clement doing the oral argument? [read post]
26 Apr 2012, 1:20 pm
Paul Clement represented Arizona, and Solicitor General Donald Verrilli represented the United States. [read post]
21 Apr 2012, 6:43 am
Clement of the law firm... [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 6:47 am
Last week, the Supreme Court of Canada released its decision in Clements v Clements. [read post]
12 Feb 2012, 7:52 am
Last week, the state of Arizona, with Counsel of Record Paul Clement, a former clerk to Justice Scalia and now high... [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 9:19 am
The two were allies in the Supreme Court’s landmark 2005 decision in MGM v. [read post]
26 Apr 2023, 11:50 am
Paul… Continue reading The post Paul Clement leads cert petition in Mazo v. [read post]
14 May 2008, 1:20 pm
Landmark cases argued by Clement include Tennessee v. [read post]
22 May 2018, 10:16 am
As Justice Antonin Scalia – Kagan’s former colleague and Clement’s former boss – famously said to those who disagreed with the Supreme Court’s decision in Bush v. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 12:53 am
The Court stated that a common sense inference of “but for” causation from proof of negligence usually flows without difficulty. [read post]
11 Apr 2018, 4:15 am
The Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit recently issued a decision in DSS Technology Management v. [read post]
30 Apr 2007, 11:30 am
Clements v. [read post]
28 Dec 2011, 9:10 pm
United States v. [read post]
6 Oct 2014, 6:00 am
Judge Clement first analyzed and concluded that United States Supreme Court jurisprudence does not require punitive damages in unseaworthiness cases. [read post]
24 Mar 2012, 2:21 pm
Three quick thoughts on the coverage: 1) Although I agree that Clement is the best proven Supreme Court advocate of his generation, I’m not as sure that Clement was the best pick for the state challengers in this case. [read post]
17 Mar 2012, 3:32 pm
” (15) But the brief also has so many citations to United States v. [read post]
29 Mar 2023, 9:58 pm
Noonan -- During oral argument before the Supreme Court on Monday in Amgen v. [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 1:11 pm
See Gideon v. [read post]
