Search for: "STATE v. DAVIDSON" Results 301 - 320 of 603
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Oct 2014, 5:28 am by Amy Howe
In his column for The Washington Post, Joe Davidson weighs in on the whistleblower case Department of Homeland Security v. [read post]
16 Sep 2014, 11:24 am by Benjamin Bissell
So asks Amy Davidson at the New Yorker, who examines the continuing legal questions over the President’s campaign in Iraq and Syria. [read post]
16 Aug 2014, 8:09 am by Idaho State Police
Trenary's Funeral Home VEHICLE YEAR 2001 VEHICLE MAKE Harley Davidson VEHICLE MODEL Motorcycle WRECKER B&B Towing HELMET Worn? [read post]
16 Aug 2014, 5:37 am by David Cheifetz
In the conclusion to the reasons for judgment of Linden J. in Davidson v. [read post]
29 Jul 2014, 8:28 am by Amy Howe
At ISCOTUSnow (video), Debbie Davidson analyzes the Court’s recent decision in Fifth Third Bancorp v. [read post]
7 May 2014, 5:22 am by Amy Howe
Monday’s opinion in Town of Greece v. [read post]
4 Apr 2014, 7:49 am by Whittel & Melton, LLC
El motociclista de 68 años iba conduciendo una Harley Davidson 2009 por la misma calle cuando vio al camiòn bajar la velocidad en el carril para dar vuelta, pero continuò dirigièndose al norte por la State Road 559. [read post]
7 Mar 2014, 12:09 pm by Rob McKinney
In State v Livesay, the Court dismissed a DUI charge because law enforcement did not allow the Defendant's doctor to draw his blood while he was in jail. [read post]
29 Jan 2014, 7:03 am by Joy Waltemath
In April 2013, a divided state appeals court held that Colorado’s Lawful Activities Statute, which prohibits employers in the state from firing employees for engaging in lawful off-duty conduct, does not bar the discharge of an employee who uses medical marijuana off the clock (Coats v Dish Network, LLC, April 25, 2013, Davidson, J). [read post]
5 Nov 2013, 1:14 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Thus, a timely protest is an essential prerequisite for relief under a CPL 330.30 (1) claim of an error of law, unless the error has deprived the defendant of a fundamental right akin to People v Davidson, People v Padro and People v Antommarchi. [read post]