Search for: "STATE v. HUNTER" Results 181 - 200 of 1,175
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Sep 2022, 8:40 pm by Guest Author
Las Vegas, 489 U.S. 538 (1989),and United States v. [read post]
President Biden will soon sign into law the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA), which provides $750 billion in funding and major federal policy changes impacting the U.S. energy, environment, healthcare and tax sectors. [read post]
1 Aug 2022, 12:11 pm by INFORRM
On the same day, the Court of Appeal handed down judgment in Mueen-Uddin v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2022] EWCA Civ 1073, dismissing by a majority the appeal from the decision of Nicol J, which struck out the Appellant’s claims in libel and data protection as abuse. [read post]
12 Jul 2022, 4:47 am by Lawrence Solum
  Here is the abstract: The United States Supreme Court recently issued a fractured decision in Viking River Cruises, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Jun 2022, 7:33 pm by binder'sblog
However, hunters and others in the less populated states are vehemently opposed to gun control. [read post]
27 Jun 2022, 10:05 pm by Jeff Richardson
Fowler and  Tatum Hunter of the Washington Post. [read post]
25 Jun 2022, 6:01 am by Benjamin Pollard
Kyleanne Hunter discussed the potential impacts that overturning Roe v. [read post]
21 Jun 2022, 1:16 pm by Benjamin Pollard
ICYMI: This Weekend on Lawfare Kyleanne Hunter discussed the potential impacts that overturning Roe v. [read post]
19 Jun 2022, 5:05 pm by admin
In a seminal discrimination case, Casteneda v. [read post]
10 Jun 2022, 5:01 am by Mark MacCarthy
It accepts that the different policy goal, articulated in the Supreme Court’s Turner Broadcasting v. [read post]
7 Jun 2022, 9:01 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
But given that the Court has already figured out how to effectively ban abortions via its so-called shadow docket (refusing to block Texas’s infamous SB8 and its $10,000 citizen bounty-hunter [read post]
5 Jun 2022, 7:02 pm by Richard Hunt
” Plaintiffs state that they live near their respective Defendants’ stores and have been customers “on prior occasions. [read post]