Search for: "STATE v. KEEN"
Results 81 - 100
of 898
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jul 2011, 6:31 am
Wolff’s keen dissent (to which Teitleman joined) in Kansas City Premier Apartments, Inc. v. [read post]
14 May 2013, 8:12 am
The ACLU of Massachusetts, through private counsel, successfully argued a motion to dismiss the complaint under the anti-SLAPP statute, which states in relevant part: "In any case in which a party asserts that the civil claims, counterclaims or cross claims against said party are based on said party's exercise of its right of petition under the constitution of the United States or of the commonwealth, said party may bring a special motion to dismiss." [read post]
23 Feb 2023, 6:41 am
As discussed by one 2013 New York state trial court decision, Lawsuit Funding, LLC v. [read post]
17 May 2023, 4:00 am
In Keene v. [read post]
21 Apr 2016, 7:22 am
Citing Gann v. [read post]
3 Feb 2011, 12:09 pm
Someone in Arlington, Mansfield, Bedford, Benbrook, Burleson, Hurst, Euless, Keene, Grand Prairie, Dallas, Fort Worth, Pantego, or anywhere else in this state would go crazy trying to understand how to correctly interpret an insurance policy. [read post]
18 Feb 2015, 5:59 am
Writing for the Keen News Service, Lisa Keen has the first part of a two-part series on the “looming task” facing the lawyers representing the challengers to state bans on same-sex marriage: “They must choose who will go before the nine justices in April to deliver the arguments orally. [read post]
6 Jul 2007, 12:58 pm
This Article offers a comprehensive examination of the Skidmore standard for judicial review of agency legal interpretations as applied by the courts in the period since the Supreme Court revitalized Skidmore in United States v. [read post]
13 Jan 2012, 1:00 am
In the case preview for R v Gnango , it was suggested that the question facing the Supreme Court read like a particularly complex examination problem. [read post]
18 Mar 2015, 9:57 am
” [emphasis added] Lord Reed is keen to make it clear that, as Lord Fraser of Tullybelton pointed out in G v G, it is not a question of whether the court below has “manifestly and to a substantial degree gone wrong” as was suggested by the Inner House in McCusker v Saveheat Cavity Wall Insulation Ltd 1987 SLT 24, 29. [read post]
7 Jan 2016, 11:17 am
United States, 534 U.S.84, 94 (2001) (quoting Circuit City Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Oct 2021, 12:43 pm
Williams v Parmar & Ors (HOUSING – RENT REPAYMENT ORDER) (2021) UKUT 244 (LC) We knew that the Upper Tribunal has been itching to get an appeal on the approach to the assessment of the amount of a rent repayment order, ever since Ficcara v James, apparently being keen to make the point that ‘the full rent’ was not a starting point in the criminal sentencing sense, as it could not go up beyond that according to landlord conduct. [read post]
3 Aug 2014, 7:45 pm
United States. [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 8:16 am
Under the rubric of the fresh decision, in addressing whether the respondents must be admitted to the UK for settlement the court said that the obligations of a state with responsibility for refugees cannot be “exported”. [read post]
20 Oct 2009, 2:19 pm
To Judge Clifton -- an eminently reasonable fellow -- as well as Judges Hawkins and Berzon, both of whom share Judge Clifton's keen (and important) understanding of the way the world actually works. [read post]
17 Jun 2010, 3:37 pm
When the case was filed and argued, we suspected it would generate keen interest, so in anticipation, the ABA's State and Local Government Law Section assembled an expert panel discussion of the case at the upcoming ABA Annual Meeting in San Francisco.Update and Lessons of Stop the Beach Renourishment v. [read post]
26 Jun 2007, 2:45 pm
Retired American officials say that, for the first time in U.S. history, nobody with serious Pakistan experience is working in the South Asia bureau of the State Department, on State's policy planning staff, on the National Security Council staff or even in Vice President Cheney's office. . . . [read post]
7 Dec 2017, 4:23 am
The first was Murphy v. [read post]
26 Feb 2013, 7:21 am
Keene, 481 U. [read post]
17 Jun 2019, 7:59 am
Writes Justice Ginsburg for the majority this morning in Virginia House of Delegates v. [read post]